Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: PET2BIDS: a library for converting Positron Emission Tomography data to BIDS #5822

Closed
editorialbot opened this issue Sep 10, 2023 · 47 comments
Assignees
Labels
Makefile Matlab pre-review Ruby TeX Track: 2 (BCM) Biomedical Engineering, Biosciences, Chemistry, and Materials

Comments

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator

editorialbot commented Sep 10, 2023

Submitting author: @CPernet (Cyril Pernet)
Repository: https://github.com/openneuropet/PET2BIDS/
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): JOSS_paper
Version: v1
Editor: @britta-wstnr
Reviewers: @nbeliy, @adswa, @pjtoussaint
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f044fa1d888de6646a8e8dfd5931d0da"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f044fa1d888de6646a8e8dfd5931d0da/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f044fa1d888de6646a8e8dfd5931d0da/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f044fa1d888de6646a8e8dfd5931d0da)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @CPernet. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@CPernet if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
@editorialbot editorialbot added pre-review Track: 2 (BCM) Biomedical Engineering, Biosciences, Chemistry, and Materials labels Sep 10, 2023
@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Wordcount for paper.md is 789

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Failed to discover a valid open source license

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1038/s41597-022-01164-1 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.049 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2011.00037 is OK
- 10.1385/ni:5:1:11 is OK
- 10.1177/0271678X20905433 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.03.001 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7795644 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1038/sdata.2016.44 may be a valid DOI for title: The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments
- 10.3389/fninf.2021.770608 may be a valid DOI for title: BIDScoin: A User-Friendly Application to Convert Source Data to Brain Imaging Data Structure

INVALID DOIs

- None

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
Copy link
Member

@editorialbot set main as branch

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Done! branch is now main

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
Copy link
Member

@editorialbot check repository

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.24 s (404.9 files/s, 88068.5 lines/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                      files          blank        comment           code
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                           27           1270           1846           4803
JSON                             12             11              0           4705
MATLAB                           20            498           1212           4023
Markdown                         16            256              0            725
YAML                              6             56             19            306
reStructuredText                  8            258            271            302
Bourne Shell                      1             23            100            269
Ruby                              1             28             12            106
TOML                              1              6              0             52
Bourne Again Shell                3             12             10             34
make                              2             15             17             34
DOS Batch                         1              8              1             26
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                             98           2441           3488          15385
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Failed to discover a Statement of need section in paper

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
Copy link
Member

@editorialbot set JOSS_paper as branch

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Done! branch is now JOSS_paper

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
Copy link
Member

@editorialbot invite @emdupre as editor

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

@emdupre
Copy link
Member

emdupre commented Sep 11, 2023

Thanks for the invitation, @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman !

I have a direct COI with one of the coauthors (MN and I were in the same lab until Dec 2022), and I have upcoming publications with several other authors---but no direct involvement---in large consortium papers re: BIDS.

If you think this can be waived, I would need a week to process one of my current submissions that's approaching end of review. But given the recent (< 1 year) shared affiliation with coauthor MN, it might make more sense for me to decline. Let me know what you think, and thanks again !

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
Copy link
Member

@emdupre thanks for declaring that potential/perceivable COI. I will aim to recruit an alternative editor.

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
Copy link
Member

@editorialbot invite @britta-wstnr as editor

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman I can take this over but only can get started in a week from now since I am travelling for work - if that's okay feel free to assign me!

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
Copy link
Member

@editorialbot assign @britta-wstnr as editor

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Assigned! @britta-wstnr is now the editor

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

@CPernet - hi!

First of all, sorry for the delay - I was sick last week.
I am the handling editor for your submission. The first step is to identify reviewers - if you have any ideas for potential reviewers, you can suggest them here --- please read the guidelines in the editorialbot's comment on how to search for reviewers and how to mention them here (do not "@" them, please).

I will be back shortly! 🙂 🌱

@CPernet
Copy link

CPernet commented Sep 26, 2023

No worries - academic life :-)

I have searched but haven't seen someone with the right background in the list -- note that it will be hard to find someone with no COI, apologies in advance.

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

Hi @CPernet ,

Thank you for the suggestions! Just to keep you up to date: I am currently inviting reviewers via email.

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

@editorialbot check references

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1038/s41597-022-01164-1 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.049 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2011.00037 is OK
- 10.1385/ni:5:1:11 is OK
- 10.1177/0271678X20905433 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.03.001 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7795644 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1038/sdata.2016.44 may be a valid DOI for title: The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments
- 10.3389/fninf.2021.770608 may be a valid DOI for title: BIDScoin: A User-Friendly Application to Convert Source Data to Brain Imaging Data Structure

INVALID DOIs

- None

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

PyBIDS: Python tools for BIDS datasets
Submitting author: @tyarkoni
Handling editor: @cMadan (Active)
Reviewers: @grlee77
Similarity score: 0.8671

BIDSonym: a BIDS App for the pseudo-anonymization of neuroimaging datasets
Submitting author: @peerherholz
Handling editor: @oliviaguest (Active)
Reviewers: @deep-introspection, @chrisgorgo, @neuromusic
Similarity score: 0.8495

Bruker2nifti: Magnetic Resonance Images converter from Bruker ParaVision to Nifti format
Submitting author: @SebastianoF
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @rougier
Similarity score: 0.8294

tacmagic: Positron emission tomography analysis in R
Submitting author: @eebrown
Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active)
Reviewers: @danielskatz
Similarity score: 0.8265

BrainGlobe Atlas API: a common interface for neuroanatomical atlases
Submitting author: @adamltyson
Handling editor: @oliviaguest (Active)
Reviewers: @typically, @vitay
Similarity score: 0.8161

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

Hi @CPernet,
quick update: I am still searching for reviewers.
In the meanwhile, could you please double check the (potentially) missing DOIs and update them (see #5822 (comment))? Thanks! 🙏

@CPernet
Copy link

CPernet commented Oct 19, 2023

thx robot for finding dois :-) added now to the .bib

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

@editorialbot check references

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1038/sdata.2016.44 is OK
- 10.1038/s41597-022-01164-1 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.049 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2011.00037 is OK
- 10.1385/ni:5:1:11 is OK
- 10.1177/0271678X20905433 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.03.001 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2021.770608 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7795644 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

Thanks @CPernet, looks good now!

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

@nbeliy has agreed via email to review - thank you! 🙏
The reviewing process will start as soon as I have found a sufficient number of reviewers. I will ping you then.

@CPernet
Copy link

CPernet commented Oct 25, 2023

@agt24 would you have ideas for reviewers? maybe some PET people at NIH whom we don't work with?

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

@adswa has agreed via email to review - thank you! 🙏
The reviewing process will start as soon as I have found a sufficient number of reviewers. I will ping you then.

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

@pjtoussaint has agreed via email to review - thank you! 🙏
With that, we can move this paper into the actual reviewing process. 🌱 That will close this issue and start a new one for the actual review - you will get pinged there and there will be explanations how to proceed.

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

@editorialbot add @nbeliy as reviewer

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@nbeliy added to the reviewers list!

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

@editorialbot add @adswa as reviewer

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@adswa added to the reviewers list!

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

@editorialbot add @pjtoussaint as reviewer

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@pjtoussaint added to the reviewers list!

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

@editorialbot start review

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

OK, I've started the review over in #6067.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Makefile Matlab pre-review Ruby TeX Track: 2 (BCM) Biomedical Engineering, Biosciences, Chemistry, and Materials
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants