Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Accept OEP-58 as it has been implemented #610

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 21, 2024
Merged

Conversation

sarina
Copy link
Contributor

@sarina sarina commented Jul 8, 2024

No description provided.

-
* `Concept doc about translations <https://docs.openedx.org/en/latest/translators/concepts/translation-process.html>`_
* `Enabling translations on a new repo <https://docs.openedx.org/en/latest/developers/how-tos/enable-translations-new-repo.html>`_
* `Follow-up Work <https://openedx.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/COMM/pages/3578494977/Translations+Management+Design+Implementation>`_
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this link be left here? Has this wiki page been fully addressed or is there work left to do? I think there may be work on that page that has not been completed, but I don't see it as work that is blocking the acceptance of this OEP. Perhaps the wiki page could be narrowed to unimplemented details.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, I'll take a look. Sorry for keeping this stale.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sarina

Should this link be left here? Has this wiki page been fully addressed or is there work left to do? I think there may be work on that page that has not been completed, but I don't see it as work that is blocking the acceptance of this OEP. Perhaps the wiki page could be narrowed to unimplemented details.

The wiki are a bit outdated and the three of the links need more work.

I'm pushing a PR to make it less outdated by fixing things locally. We may still need to refactor the docs to become more digestable.

Is it just me or the documentation work is hard?

@sarina sarina merged commit 6cdc797 into master Jul 21, 2024
5 checks passed
@sarina sarina deleted the accept-oep-58 branch July 21, 2024 17:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants