Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify OTLP server components MUST support none/gzip compression. #1955

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Sep 29, 2021

Conversation

carlosalberto
Copy link
Contributor

As mentioned in #1923 we need to be explicit on the compression support for the transports on the client AND server side (i.e.g collector receivers at this time).

cc @tigrannajaryan @bogdandrutu

@carlosalberto carlosalberto requested review from a team September 22, 2021 13:13
@carlosalberto carlosalberto changed the title Mention OTLP transports MUST support none/gzip compression. Clarify OTLP transports MUST support none/gzip compression. Sep 22, 2021
specification/protocol/otlp.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/protocol/otlp.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@arminru arminru added area:sdk Related to the SDK spec:protocol Related to the specification/protocol directory labels Sep 24, 2021
@carlosalberto carlosalberto changed the title Clarify OTLP transports MUST support none/gzip compression. Clarify OTLP server-side MUST support none/gzip compression. Sep 26, 2021
@carlosalberto carlosalberto changed the title Clarify OTLP server-side MUST support none/gzip compression. Clarify OTLP server components MUST support none/gzip compression. Sep 26, 2021
@carlosalberto
Copy link
Contributor Author

@open-telemetry/specs-approvers Please review/approve. In yesterday's Maintainers meeting this item was discussed and it seems we won't be breaking anything out there.

cc @open-telemetry/proto-go-approvers @open-telemetry/javascript-approvers

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:sdk Related to the SDK spec:protocol Related to the specification/protocol directory
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants