Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[receiver/jaegerreceiver] Remove jaeger remote sampling from receiver #14163

Conversation

frzifus
Copy link
Member

@frzifus frzifus commented Sep 16, 2022

Description: Remove jaeger remote sampling from jaegerreceiver

Link to tracking Issue: #6633

Testing: adapt unittest

Documentation:

@frzifus frzifus requested a review from a team September 16, 2022 12:21
@frzifus frzifus requested a review from jpkrohling as a code owner September 16, 2022 12:21
@frzifus frzifus changed the title Remove jaeger remote sampling from receiver #6633 Remove jaeger remote sampling from receiver Sep 16, 2022
@frzifus frzifus changed the title Remove jaeger remote sampling from receiver [receiver/jaegerreceiver] Remove jaeger remote sampling from receiver Sep 16, 2022
Copy link
Member

@jpkrohling jpkrohling left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The change type has to be "breaking". Perhaps note in the description the issue that started the deprecation?

@yuriolisa: this change will require an upgrade routine for the operator. Basically, use the new jaeger remote sampling extension instead of the remote sampling endpoint that was part of the jaeger receiver.

@frzifus frzifus force-pushed the remove_jaeger_remote_sampling_from_receiver_#6633 branch from 1ff162e to 15fe181 Compare September 16, 2022 12:32
Signed-off-by: Benedikt Bongartz <[email protected]>
@frzifus frzifus force-pushed the remove_jaeger_remote_sampling_from_receiver_#6633 branch from 86d39d3 to 6ea7efc Compare September 16, 2022 13:01
@jpkrohling jpkrohling merged commit 685c8b8 into open-telemetry:main Sep 16, 2022
djaglowski pushed a commit to djaglowski/opentelemetry-collector-contrib that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2022
@frzifus frzifus deleted the remove_jaeger_remote_sampling_from_receiver_#6633 branch September 21, 2022 15:49
mx-psi pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2024
#### Description
The remote sampling functionality has been already removed from
`jaegerreceiver` in #14163. The logged warning has no impact or meaning.

#### Link to tracking issue
Fixes #35894

#### Testing
CI

---------

Signed-off-by: Yuri Shkuro <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Yang Song <[email protected]>
sbylica-splunk pushed a commit to sbylica-splunk/opentelemetry-collector-contrib that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2024
#### Description
The remote sampling functionality has been already removed from
`jaegerreceiver` in open-telemetry#14163. The logged warning has no impact or meaning.

#### Link to tracking issue
Fixes open-telemetry#35894

#### Testing
CI

---------

Signed-off-by: Yuri Shkuro <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Yang Song <[email protected]>
mterhar pushed a commit to mterhar/opentelemetry-collector-contrib that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2024
The remote sampling functionality has been already removed from
`jaegerreceiver` in open-telemetry#14163. The logged warning has no impact or meaning.

Fixes open-telemetry#35894

CI

---------

Signed-off-by: Yuri Shkuro <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Yang Song <[email protected]>
AkhigbeEromo pushed a commit to sematext/opentelemetry-collector-contrib that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2025
#### Description
The remote sampling functionality has been already removed from
`jaegerreceiver` in open-telemetry#14163. The logged warning has no impact or meaning.

#### Link to tracking issue
Fixes open-telemetry#35894

#### Testing
CI

---------

Signed-off-by: Yuri Shkuro <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Yang Song <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants