Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add rocm support for rocm platform #473

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

XuanBaby
Copy link
Contributor

@XuanBaby XuanBaby commented Aug 8, 2020

No description provided.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.


xuanbaby seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 8, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #473 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #473   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   63.07%   63.07%           
=======================================
  Files         128      128           
  Lines        7191     7191           
  Branches     1267     1267           
=======================================
  Hits         4536     4536           
  Misses       2429     2429           
  Partials      226      226           
Flag Coverage Δ
#unittests 63.07% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update edbbc0f...3e51291. Read the comment docs.

@hellock
Copy link
Member

hellock commented Aug 9, 2020

Is this PR basically the same as #393?

@XuanBaby
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is this PR basically the same as #393?

ya before I porting this project ,dont notice this #393

@zhouzaida
Copy link
Collaborator

duplicated PR with #1022

@zhouzaida zhouzaida closed this Jun 29, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants