-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release 0.23 - Thumbs Up #1484
Release 0.23 - Thumbs Up #1484
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking good!
|
||
**Features** | ||
|
||
- Added support for probing for an GitHub Enterprise instance - #1404 via @haacked |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe this should say "Added support to test whether a URL points to a GitHub Enterprise instance"
**Breaking Changes** | ||
|
||
Repository identifiers returned from the GitHub API will exceed `Int32.MaxValue` in | ||
around 12 months, based on current growth. We've decided to update everywhere we |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wow. 😱
@ryangribble I've added those two PRs to my checklist |
cd6c199
to
9668d9f
Compare
I'll open up some tasks for those integration tests I've muted here tomorrow. |
Are you still shooting for Thursday release or going to go earlier? Regarding #1477 I checked just now and the behaviour is unchanged. It's reasonably safe to 🚢 anyway since it just means that allowed merge method fields are ignored on repo creation, and the respective response fields are returned Meanwhile the |
@ryangribble yeah, still shooting for Thursday. I'll look over #1477 in the morning and check the tests are good to go. |
If the |
@ryangribble cool, I'll throw some feedback in that PR to see if we should partially ship it |
Turns out it's a doco error and the create method isn't going to support the feature at this time, so I'll fix up that PR tomorrow |
#1477 is updated and good to 🚢 |
Oops, missed this yesterday due to other commitments. I'll push this out this afternoon. |
Aiming to ship this Thursday 6 October AEST. Running through the test suite today/tomorrow.