2025-01-27 Release #826
2025-01-27 Release #826
Conversation
anitacaron
requested review from
ddooley,
wdduncan,
balhoff and
jamesaoverton
|
|
||
| AnnotationAssertion(rdfs:label <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000067> "contains process"@en) | ||
| AnnotationAssertion(<http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000115> <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000055> "Paraphrase of elucidation: a relation between a process and a realizable entity, where there is some material entity that is bearer of the realizable entity and participates in the process, and the realizable entity comes to be realized in the course of the process") | ||
| AnnotationAssertion(rdfs:label <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000055> "realizes") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reason QC failed:
ERROR multiple_labels realizes rdfs:label realizes
ERROR multiple_labels realizes rdfs:label realizes@en
COB import updated to have BFO:0000055 and moved away from defining the labels using the language. However, BFO:0000055 label in the core.owl file uses language.
Should we remove the language tag on the core.owl file?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think the right thing to do is make COB use "realizes"@en. I started using a template for COB terms, which makes it annoying to change just one term to use a language tag, and if they all us @en then that could cause similar multiple_labels problems... I'll try a few things.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I tried a few things, and I have a few options, but I'm not sure which to choose. I'll get back to you tomorrow.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think I want to fix this by using @en for all labels in COB. I created this issue for discussion: OBOFoundry/COB#293
No description provided.