Extend grammar to mark objects to be named automatically

[maxonfjvipon]

It would be convenient to have a syntax construction in EO which would signal to compiler that object should be named automatically without explicit name from end-user.
For example:

[] > object
  x
    [] >>
      5.plus 5 > ten

Here >> signals that this abstract object should be uniquely named automatically by compiler.
Only abstract objects should be able to use such syntax

[github-actions]

@maxonfjvipon thanks for the report, here is a feedback:

Problems

• The bug report title is too generic and doesn't accurately describe the issue. It needs to be brief and informative.
• Absence of details about the software environment or version where the problem has occurred. This data is crucial for developers to recreate the issue.
• The bug report does not include steps to replicate the problem, which makes it difficult for developers to comprehend and address the issue.

Suggestion

Improve the bug report title to accurately and concisely describe the issue, for example: "Need for Auto-Naming Syntax in EO Compiler for Abstract Objects".

Please fix the bug report in order it to get resolved faster.
Analyzed with gpt-4

[yegor256]

@maxonfjvipon if this is only applicable for abstract objects, maybe we can use this syntax (no space after the []):

[] > object
  x
    []>
      5.plus 5 > ten

[maxonfjvipon]

@yegor256 as for me []> looks like syntax error because of the missed space. Let's stick with >> for now. We'll be able to change it anytime in the future when it works