Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dgram: remove a needless instanceof Buffer check #4301

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ronkorving
Copy link
Contributor

When a string is passed to udpsock.send, it is automatically converted to a Buffer. In that case, it is no longer needed to test whether or not the argument is a Buffer.

When a string is passed to udpsock.send, it is automatically
converted to a Buffer. In that case, it is no longer needed
to test whether or not the argument is a Buffer or not.
@cjihrig
Copy link
Contributor

cjihrig commented Dec 16, 2015

LGTM

@mscdex mscdex added the dgram Issues and PRs related to the dgram subsystem / UDP. label Dec 16, 2015
@mscdex
Copy link
Contributor

mscdex commented Dec 16, 2015

LGTM

1 similar comment
@silverwind
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@silverwind
Copy link
Contributor

silverwind pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2015
When a string is passed to udpsock.send, it is automatically
converted to a Buffer. In that case, it is no longer needed
to test whether or not the argument is a Buffer or not.

PR-URL: #4301
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Brian White <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <[email protected]>
@silverwind
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks! Landed in 4b267df.

@silverwind silverwind closed this Dec 16, 2015
@ronkorving
Copy link
Contributor Author

That was fast :) Thanks.

@ronkorving ronkorving deleted the udp-type-check branch December 16, 2015 05:56
@silverwind
Copy link
Contributor

Well, that was easy to review 😉.

Oh, and I noticed the module name should have been dgram, but that's rather minor.

@ronkorving ronkorving changed the title udp: remove a needless instanceof Buffer check dgram: remove a needless instanceof Buffer check Dec 16, 2015
@ronkorving
Copy link
Contributor Author

Too late to change the commit log I guess, but I renamed the PR.

@silverwind
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, not going to force-push for something negligible like that 😉.

cjihrig pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2015
When a string is passed to udpsock.send, it is automatically
converted to a Buffer. In that case, it is no longer needed
to test whether or not the argument is a Buffer or not.

PR-URL: #4301
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Brian White <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <[email protected]>

Conflicts:
	lib/dgram.js
@rvagg rvagg mentioned this pull request Dec 17, 2015
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2015
When a string is passed to udpsock.send, it is automatically
converted to a Buffer. In that case, it is no longer needed
to test whether or not the argument is a Buffer or not.

PR-URL: #4301
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Brian White <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2016
When a string is passed to udpsock.send, it is automatically
converted to a Buffer. In that case, it is no longer needed
to test whether or not the argument is a Buffer or not.

PR-URL: #4301
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Brian White <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Jan 19, 2016
scovetta pushed a commit to scovetta/node that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2016
When a string is passed to udpsock.send, it is automatically
converted to a Buffer. In that case, it is no longer needed
to test whether or not the argument is a Buffer or not.

PR-URL: nodejs#4301
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Brian White <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dgram Issues and PRs related to the dgram subsystem / UDP.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants