Upgrade to yarn 0.24.4

[SimenB]

Should close #381 as well

[pesho]

Thanks, but I think Yarn should be upgraded together with new Node.js releases, as proposed in #393. Therefore 👎

[SimenB]

This version fixes the bug in #346, though. Although I think it makes sense to do #393 after this 😄

[razor-x]

In my opinion the node-gyp regression is serious and should not remain unpatched: we need to address it either by merging this or #346.

[pesho]

This version fixes the bug in #346, though. Although I think it makes sense to do #393 after this

Ok, this could be justified in order to get to a stable working state before becoming more conservative with updates. If the other @nodejs/docker members agree, let's merge this.

In my opinion the node-gyp regression is serious should not remain unpatched: we need address it either by merging this or #346.

Merging this would be the better option.

[chorrell]

I tend to agree. We can be stricter about updating yarn after this lands.

[Starefossen]

Second it. LGTM

…

On 13 May 2017, at 01:35, Christopher Horrell ***@***.***> wrote: I tend to agree. We can be stricter about updating yarn after this lands. — You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[pesho]

Merged. Working on Docker Hub PR.

[pesho]

Docker Hub PR: docker-library/official-images#2950