-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
Change language as defined by NF Legal #384
Change language as defined by NF Legal #384
Conversation
author: @hackygolucky Original PR (reverted for further discussion): #380
FTR: I don't have a proposed change. I just wanted to make sure we have all the information, and that the changes that do land are those that have been approved. What I did notice is that the current change (addition of 7.5) is self conflicting, and seemingly repetitive 7.4
7.5
I wanted to make sure if the final approved language was to add paragraph (5) or to replace paragraph (4). |
@refack what was approved by the board was this exact language. Keep in mind that the "true charter" is an amalgamation of all the motions approved by the board. We could in theory go through all those motions and redraft a charter and have that approved. So it is important to think about the "intent" or "spirit" of the charter. That does not mean we should not fix this, more that it isn't a huge deal to have it temporarily not make as much sense. I've opened #385 to simplify the text, this is based on the current text found in the TSC charter. Notice that it does remove the bit regarding the individual member director /cc @williamkapke |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
To make myself clear. Since this change was authored and coordinated by @hackygolucky I would like their review and approval. |
@refack the original post by @bnb assigned @hackygolucky as a reviewer on this |
I'm not sure what we want here as I was the original PR post, so I don't think this makes sense for me to +1? The point of process is to get two +1s from CommComm members, mark as DO NOT MERGE, and then the Board approves what we've already approved. Once that occurs. It is ready for merge. I can merge, I shouldn't +1 my own PR. |
I can't technically add a +1 with a GitHub approval since I created this PR, but consider this my +1. |
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Changes to CommComm membership should be posted in the agenda, and may be sugges | |||
|
|||
No more than one-fourth of the CommComm members may be affiliated with the same employer or leadership of a community/ecosystem organization. If removal or resignation of a CommComm member, or a change of employment by a CommComm member, creates a situation where more than one-fourth of the CommComm membership shares an employer, then the situation must be immediately remedied by the resignation or removal of one or more CommComm members affiliated with the over-represented employer(s). | |||
|
|||
The CommComm members shall consist of active members of Community Projects and the two Individual Membership Directors as defined in Section 10. | |||
The CommComm members shall consist of active members of Community Projects and the two Individual Membership Directors. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not two anymore
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lets make this change on #385 👍
This has been open for a while with 7/15 giving explicit approval, and no explicit opposition – we're going to have Tracy bring this to the board this week for approval and then we can merge it in 🎉 Please pile on to #385 to make further language changes. Given our velocity the past week, I don't think we'll have that PR ready to present by this week's board meeting, but I'd like to prioritize it so we can bring it to the next one for approval. Go forth and govern 😉 |
LGTM |
Board approved. Removed do-not-merge tag. |
Original PR contents:
Original PR author: @hackygolucky
Original PR link (reverted for further discussion): #380