Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Reverse for 'netboxuser-list' not found when editing #14840

Closed
Atamas95 opened this issue Jan 18, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #14881
Closed

Reverse for 'netboxuser-list' not found when editing #14840

Atamas95 opened this issue Jan 18, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #14881
Assignees
@DanSheps
Labels
severity: low Does not significantly disrupt application functionality, or a workaround is available status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application

Comments

@Atamas95
Copy link

Deployment Type

Self-hosted

NetBox Version

3.7.0

Python Version

3.9

Steps to Reproduce

Create a new custom field: type:object, object-type: users>user.

Expected Behavior

When editing a device/inventory-item, you can select a netbox user within the specified custom field.

Observed Behavior

When editing to sleect a netbox user, I get the following error message:

<class 'django.urls.exceptions.NoReverseMatch'>

Reverse for 'netboxuser-list' not found. 'netboxuser-list' is not a valid view function or pattern name.

Python version: 3.9.2
NetBox version: 3.7.0
Plugins: None installed
@Atamas95 Atamas95 added the type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application label Jan 18, 2024
@abhi1693 abhi1693 added status: needs owner This issue is tentatively accepted pending a volunteer committed to its implementation severity: low Does not significantly disrupt application functionality, or a workaround is available labels Jan 18, 2024
@DanSheps DanSheps added status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation and removed status: needs owner This issue is tentatively accepted pending a volunteer committed to its implementation labels Jan 19, 2024
@DanSheps DanSheps self-assigned this Jan 19, 2024
DanSheps added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 20, 2024
@DanSheps
Fixes: #14840 - Forces API to use proxy model
df85cc9
@DanSheps DanSheps mentioned this issue Jan 20, 2024
Merged
DanSheps added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 24, 2024
@DanSheps
Revert "Fixes: #14840 - Forces API to use proxy model"
3ab8caa 
This reverts commit df85cc9.
@jeremystretch jeremystretch mentioned this issue Jan 24, 2024
Closed
DanSheps added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 26, 2024
@DanSheps
Fixes: #14840 - Better fix for netboxusers-list
8be1f9d
@abhi1693 abhi1693 mentioned this issue Jan 29, 2024
Closed
jeremystretch pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 5, 2024
@DanSheps
Fixes: #14840 - Forces API to use django user model instead of proxy …
32083e5 
…model (#14881)

* Fixes: #14840 - Forces API to use proxy model

* Update tests to use proxy model

* Revert "Update tests to use proxy model"

This reverts commit 1d784cf.

* Revert "Fixes: #14840 - Forces API to use proxy model"

This reverts commit df85cc9.

* More realistic change to resole issue with netboxusers-list

* Revert "More realistic change to resole issue with netboxusers-list"

This reverts commit 15df808.

* Fixes: #14840 - Better fix for netboxusers-list

* Swap model for serializer from proxy model
@jeremystretch jeremystretch mentioned this issue Feb 5, 2024
Merged
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 6, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@DanSheps DanSheps

Labels
severity: low Does not significantly disrupt application functionality, or a workaround is available status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Fixes: #14840 - Forces API to use django user model instead of proxy model netbox-community/netbox
3 participants
@abhi1693 @DanSheps @Atamas95