-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 229
Community CCB Notes: April 08 2020
Notes for CCB Meeting on April 08, 2020
All notes enclosed in
comment blocks
- Trying out using GitHub Wiki for Agenda and Notes
- Version Numbers: Release number follows SemVer. The main discussion revolves around numbering development updates.
-
OSAL PR#396 doesn't work with current cFE using OMIT_DEPRECATED. Here are some options:
- Keep the merge pending and update the bundle without OSAL until the cFE update is implemented
Publish regardless of OMIT_DEPRECATED not working since the bundle works otherwise- Code-fence the newly "broken" cFE functionailty with it's own OMIT_DEPRECATED tags
@astrogeco will choose either the first or last option and proceed with merge
- PR #574: Fix #573 update RTEMS example Toolchain
APPROVED
- PR #585: Fix #581, Propagate the OSAL compile definitions to CFE build
APPROVED
- PR #402: Fix #232, pthread stack min typo
APPROVED
- PR #404: OSAL build cleanup (multiple issues)
APPROVED
- PR #405: Fix #397, Remove old unit test example, add README.md, further macro cleanup
APPROVED
- PR #146: Fix #145, Update RTEMS CMake module - APPROVED
- PR #148: Fix #135, Add separate CMakeLists.txt for each implementation
- PR #149: Fix #121, Unify CFE PSP with OSAL BSP - APPROVED
- PR #46: Fix #121, Unify CFE PSP with OSAL BSP
Definition of message IDs is a concern. Will need to be split up into multiple pieces
- PR #149: Fix #121, Unify CFE PSP with OSAL BSP
Definition of message IDs is a concern. Will need to be split up into multiple pieces
- PR #38: Fix #37, Opaque CFE_SB_MsgId_t values
Definition of message IDs is a concern. Will need to be split up into multiple pieces
- PR #54: Fix #53, Opaque CFE_SB_MsgId_t values
Definition of message IDs is a concern. Will need to be split up into multiple pieces
- OSAL build cleanup (multiple issues) #404
Generally, everyone likes the concept. @acudmore to review by the end of the week. Consider breaking up.
- Fix #245, Opaque CFE_SB_MsgId_t values #592
Architecture/design change - requires further review. Will likely be pushed to a later date (Fall timeframe?). Will need to break up into smaller pieces/commit. At a minimum split commit into 2 parts for use of application of message ID to value function.
- Fix# 543, Expose CFE_SB_GetPktType #593
Conditionally approved. Change such that 0 value is invalid. @jphickey is planning to submit an additional comment/change request offline
Latest Configuration Control Board Agenda
Notes from previous CCB Meeting
Join our Community Forum!
Contact the cFS team:
[email protected]