-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 790
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Limit and add optional "offset" & "count" parameters for "delegators" RPC #3330
Comments
shryder
added a commit
to shryder/nano-node
that referenced
this issue
Jun 12, 2021
shryder
added a commit
to shryder/nano-node
that referenced
this issue
Jun 12, 2021
shryder
added a commit
to shryder/nano-node
that referenced
this issue
Jun 13, 2021
The |
shryder
added a commit
to shryder/nano-node
that referenced
this issue
Jun 13, 2021
shryder
added a commit
to shryder/nano-node
that referenced
this issue
Jun 13, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Summary
Limit the amount of delegators returned by the "delegators" RPC and add the optional parameters "offset" and "count".
What problem would be solved by this feature?
If I send multiple "delegators" RPC commands to my node for the rep NF#1 for example (it has ~16 million delegators)
The second problem is for services having to cache this data instead of getting up-to-date information through the RPC when desired.
Are there any previous requests for this feature?
I don't know
Do you have a suggested solution?
So my suggestion is
The first suggestion is so the weak nodes don't crash
The second and third is so the user/service doesn't have to wait a long time to get the current delegators list.
Explorers currently make the request every once in a while and cache the delegators instead of showing live data.
If this feature is approved, would you be willing to submit a pull request with the solution?
I would
Possible solution
No response
Supporting files
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: