Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #1380]💫Add QueryConsumeQueueResponseBody #2121

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 6, 2025

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Jan 6, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1380

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added a new QueryConsumeQueueResponseBody struct for handling consume queue query responses
    • Implemented serialization and deserialization support for the new response body
    • Included fields for subscription data, filter data, queue data, and queue index tracking

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new module query_consume_queue_response_body in the RocketMQ remoting protocol implementation. A new Rust struct QueryConsumeQueueResponseBody is defined with fields representing consume queue response data, including subscription data, filter data, queue data, and queue index ranges. The struct is designed with Serde serialization support and includes a default implementation with a corresponding unit test to verify default field values.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body.rs Added new module declaration: pub mod query_consume_queue_response_body
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/query_consume_queue_response_body.rs Created new file defining QueryConsumeQueueResponseBody struct with serialization, debug, and default traits

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Convert QueryConsumeQueueResponseBody Java class to Rust struct [#1380]

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

feature, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN
  • rocketmq-rust-bot

Poem

🚀 In the realm of queues and data's flow,
A Rust struct emerges, ready to grow
QueryConsumeQueue, precise and bright
Serialized magic, taking flight!
Code transforms, a rabbit's delight 🐰


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@RocketmqRustBot RocketmqRustBot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Jan 6, 2025
@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

@RocketmqRustBot RocketmqRustBot added the feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project. label Jan 6, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 28.06%. Comparing base (00ca74c) to head (4b45870).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2121   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   28.06%   28.06%           
=======================================
  Files         494      495    +1     
  Lines       71021    71029    +8     
=======================================
+ Hits        19929    19937    +8     
  Misses      51092    51092           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/query_consume_queue_response_body.rs (2)

24-32: Consider making struct fields public if needed externally.

Currently, the fields in QueryConsumeQueueResponseBody are private, which is fine if they are only used within this module. However, if they are intended for broader use, consider declaring them as pub or providing accessor methods to align with typical API usage.

- pub struct QueryConsumeQueueResponseBody {
-     subscription_data: SubscriptionData,
-     filter_data: CheetahString,
-     ...
+ pub struct QueryConsumeQueueResponseBody {
+     pub subscription_data: SubscriptionData,
+     pub filter_data: CheetahString,
+     ...

34-47: Tests are well-defined but consider covering non-default scenarios.

Default value checks are thorough; you might further strengthen test coverage by verifying the serialization/deserialization behaviors under typical or non-default field values.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 00ca74c and 4b45870.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/query_consume_queue_response_body.rs (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: auto-approve
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (3)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body.rs (1)

46-46: Addition of query_consume_queue_response_body module looks good.

No functional side effects are introduced here, and the naming aligns with existing conventions in this file.

rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/query_consume_queue_response_body.rs (2)

1-16: License header and formatting are valid.

The Apache License notice is properly included, reflecting compliance with the project’s licensing standards.


17-23: Imports are clear and well-organized.

All imported modules (cheetah_string, serde, local references) are relevant and used in the subsequent struct definition. No issues found.

Copy link
Collaborator

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature🚀] Add QueryConsumeQueueResponseBody
3 participants