-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 112
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ISSUE #1380]💫Add QueryConsumeQueueResponseBody #2121
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new module Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉! 💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥! Note 🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2121 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 28.06% 28.06%
=======================================
Files 494 495 +1
Lines 71021 71029 +8
=======================================
+ Hits 19929 19937 +8
Misses 51092 51092 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/query_consume_queue_response_body.rs (2)
24-32
: Consider making struct fields public if needed externally.Currently, the fields in
QueryConsumeQueueResponseBody
are private, which is fine if they are only used within this module. However, if they are intended for broader use, consider declaring them aspub
or providing accessor methods to align with typical API usage.- pub struct QueryConsumeQueueResponseBody { - subscription_data: SubscriptionData, - filter_data: CheetahString, - ... + pub struct QueryConsumeQueueResponseBody { + pub subscription_data: SubscriptionData, + pub filter_data: CheetahString, + ...
34-47
: Tests are well-defined but consider covering non-default scenarios.Default value checks are thorough; you might further strengthen test coverage by verifying the serialization/deserialization behaviors under typical or non-default field values.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body.rs
(1 hunks)rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/query_consume_queue_response_body.rs
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
- GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
- GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
- GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: auto-approve
- GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
- GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (3)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body.rs (1)
46-46
: Addition ofquery_consume_queue_response_body
module looks good.No functional side effects are introduced here, and the naming aligns with existing conventions in this file.
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/query_consume_queue_response_body.rs (2)
1-16
: License header and formatting are valid.The Apache License notice is properly included, reflecting compliance with the project’s licensing standards.
17-23
: Imports are clear and well-organized.All imported modules (
cheetah_string
,serde
, local references) are relevant and used in the subsequent struct definition. No issues found.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #1380
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
QueryConsumeQueueResponseBody
struct for handling consume queue query responses