Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #2079]💫Add HAConnectionRuntimeInfo for rust🚀 #2080

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 4, 2025

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Jan 4, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #2079

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a new module for High Availability (HA) connection runtime information tracking
    • Introduced a structured way to capture and represent connection runtime details
  • Tests

    • Included unit tests to validate the new HA connection runtime information struct

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 4, 2025

Walkthrough

A new module ha_connection_runtime_info has been added to the RocketMQ remoting protocol body in Rust. This module introduces a public struct HAConnectionRuntimeInfo that represents runtime information for high-availability (HA) connections. The struct includes fields for connection address, slave acknowledgment offset, synchronization status, and other relevant runtime metrics. The implementation includes trait derivations for debugging, cloning, serialization, and deserialization, along with a custom Display trait implementation for readable string representation.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body.rs Added new module declaration pub mod ha_connection_runtime_info;
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/ha_connection_runtime_info.rs New file introducing HAConnectionRuntimeInfo struct with runtime connection metrics and unit tests

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add HAConnectionRuntimeInfo for Rust [#2079]

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN

Poem

🚀 A Rabbit's Ode to HA Connections 🐰

In bytes and bits, a runtime tale unfolds,
Where connections dance and metrics take hold,
With offsets sync'd and status bright,
Our RocketMQ leaps to new height!

Hop hop hooray! 🌟


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e1d64b7 and e3c27f2.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/ha_connection_runtime_info.rs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body.rs (1)

36-36: Module import looks good

The new HA connection runtime info module is consistently named and placed. No issues noted with the module declaration.

rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/ha_connection_runtime_info.rs (3)

33-47: Display trait is well-implemented

Nice, the Display trait effectively formats the internal state for quick debugging and logging.


49-98: Good test coverage

The test suite thoroughly covers initialization, default values, and display formatting. This aligns well with best practices.


22-31: Consider verifying offset and difference field types

The structure fields slave_ack_offset (u64) and diff (i64) can handle extremely large or negative values, respectively. If negative offsets are invalid in your context, consider changing or enforcing constraints at runtime.

✅ Verification successful

Let me search for more context about how this struct is used in the actual codebase.


Let me search for more context about the HA (High Availability) implementation to understand the offset and diff usage better.


Let me check one more thing about the broker roles and replication to understand the context better.


The field types are correctly chosen for HA replication

Based on the codebase analysis, the field types in HAConnectionRuntimeInfo are appropriate for their intended use in RocketMQ's high availability implementation:

  • slave_ack_offset (u64): Used to track acknowledged offsets from slave brokers. Unsigned is correct as offsets are always positive and can grow large in message systems.
  • diff (i64): The signed type is intentional as it represents the difference between master and slave offsets, which can be negative when the slave lags behind.

Evidence from the codebase:

  • The struct is used in HA (High Availability) replication between master and slave brokers
  • The broker roles (AsyncMaster, SyncMaster, Slave) and their interactions confirm this is part of the replication mechanism
  • Similar offset types are used consistently throughout the codebase (e.g., master_flushed_offset, confirm_phy_offset)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Searching for usage of HAConnectionRuntimeInfo to confirm offsets usage:
rg -A 10 'HAConnectionRuntimeInfo'

Length of output: 6122


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for files importing or using HAConnectionRuntimeInfo
rg -l "HAConnectionRuntimeInfo"

# Search for any offset-related code patterns that might give context
rg -A 5 "slave_ack_offset|diff.*offset"

Length of output: 4338


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for HA-related code and offset handling
rg -A 5 "class.*HA|struct.*HA|impl.*HA"

# Search for any documentation about HA or offset handling
fd README.md | xargs rg -i "ha|offset|replication"

Length of output: 5330


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for broker role and replication related code
rg -A 5 "BrokerRole|enum.*Role"

# Search for slave-related code that might explain the offset usage
rg -A 5 "slave.*offset|master.*offset"

Length of output: 36782


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

@RocketmqRustBot RocketmqRustBot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Jan 4, 2025
@RocketmqRustBot RocketmqRustBot added the feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project. label Jan 4, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 4, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 28.40%. Comparing base (f93a956) to head (e3c27f2).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2080      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   28.36%   28.40%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         489      490       +1     
  Lines       69495    69585      +90     
==========================================
+ Hits        19713    19766      +53     
- Misses      49782    49819      +37     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature🚀] Add HAConnectionRuntimeInfo for rust
3 participants