Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #1992]🍻Implement PopMessageProcessor#get_init_offset method logic🚀 #1993

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 1, 2025

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Jan 1, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1992

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added configuration option init_pop_offset_by_check_msg_in_mem for broker settings
    • Enhanced message processing logic for offset initialization and retrieval
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated type handling for client and remote addresses in various message processing methods
  • Refactor

    • Modified method signatures to improve type consistency across message processing components

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 1, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to several components within the RocketMQ broker system, primarily focusing on changes in offset management and message processing. The key changes include updating method signatures to use CheetahString instead of SocketAddr or &str, modifying how client addresses are handled when committing offsets, and adding a new configuration option in the BrokerConfig struct. These changes appear to be part of a broader effort to standardize string handling and enhance the flexibility of message offset processing.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-broker/src/offset/manager/consumer_offset_manager.rs Changed commit_offset method parameter from SocketAddr to CheetahString for client_host
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/ack_message_processor.rs Updated remote address conversion in ack_orderly method using .to_string().into()
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/consumer_manage_processor.rs Modified commit_offset call to convert remote address to string
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/default_pull_message_result_handler.rs Changed try_commit_offset method parameter from SocketAddr to String
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/pop_message_processor.rs Updated get_init_offset method parameters to use CheetahString, added new imports and offset logic
rocketmq-broker/src/transaction/queue/transactional_message_bridge.rs Converted store_host to string in update_consume_offset method
rocketmq-common/src/common/broker/broker_config.rs Added new init_pop_offset_by_check_msg_in_mem boolean configuration field

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Implement PopMessageProcessor#get_init_offset method logic [#1992]

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

feature, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • SpaceXCN
  • TeslaRustor

Poem

🚀 Offsets dancing, strings anew,
Cheetah leaps through code so true,
Broker's logic, refined and bright,
Messages flow with pure delight!
RocketMQ soars, no bugs in sight! 🐰


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 1, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 2.77778% with 35 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 28.29%. Comparing base (a97e28b) to head (dd15317).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...etmq-broker/src/processor/pop_message_processor.rs 0.00% 30 Missing ⚠️
...oker/src/offset/manager/consumer_offset_manager.rs 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
...etmq-broker/src/processor/ack_message_processor.rs 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
...-broker/src/processor/consumer_manage_processor.rs 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
...c/processor/default_pull_message_result_handler.rs 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
.../transaction/queue/transactional_message_bridge.rs 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1993      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   28.30%   28.29%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         487      487              
  Lines       68411    68438      +27     
==========================================
+ Hits        19362    19363       +1     
- Misses      49049    49075      +26     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
rocketmq-common/src/common/broker/broker_config.rs (1)

189-189: Add documentation or in-code comments for new field usage.
A new configuration field init_pop_offset_by_check_msg_in_mem has been introduced. Consider documenting its purpose to maintain clarity for contributors.

rocketmq-broker/src/processor/pop_message_processor.rs (2)

832-832: String conversion of client address might introduce minor overhead.

Converting channel.remote_address() into a string could introduce overhead if called repeatedly in performance-critical paths. Evaluate if it aligns with the new offset manager interface expecting CheetahString or if a more direct approach exists.


880-880: Repeated string conversion for client address.

Just like in line 832, ensure that converting to a string is the best approach given the interface requirements. Otherwise, code is consistent with the revised commit_offset signature.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a97e28b and dd15317.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/offset/manager/consumer_offset_manager.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/processor/ack_message_processor.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/processor/consumer_manage_processor.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/processor/default_pull_message_result_handler.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/processor/pop_message_processor.rs (4 hunks)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/transaction/queue/transactional_message_bridge.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-common/src/common/broker/broker_config.rs (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/processor/consumer_manage_processor.rs
🔇 Additional comments (8)
rocketmq-broker/src/transaction/queue/transactional_message_bridge.rs (1)

124-124: Confirm address string correctness and potential parsing errors.
Converting the SocketAddr to String with to_string() is functionally consistent with the upstream changes. However, ensure that any downstream logic relying on IP/port splitting is fully compatible with string-based addresses.

Would you like me to scan the codebase to find all usages of commit_offset that might rely on an IP/port format?

rocketmq-broker/src/offset/manager/consumer_offset_manager.rs (1)

111-111: Ensure consistency with other methods requiring a host address.
Changing client_host from SocketAddr to CheetahString can allow more flexible representations (e.g., domain name). Make sure other methods (like commit_pull_offset) remain consistent if they eventually need the same flexibility.

rocketmq-broker/src/processor/ack_message_processor.rs (1)

520-520: Check IP address usage in logs or metrics.
Using channel.remote_address().to_string().into() ensures consistency in passing the host as a string for commit_offset. However, confirm that any log statements or diagnostics expecting a SocketAddr do not break or lose necessary structured data (e.g., splitting IP and port).

rocketmq-common/src/common/broker/broker_config.rs (1)

282-282: Default initialization to true may affect pop offset logic.
Initializing init_pop_offset_by_check_msg_in_mem to true might introduce new behaviors when checking offsets in memory. Verify that any consumer or internal checks are prepared for this default value.

Would you like me to perform a search for references to init_pop_offset_by_check_msg_in_mem to confirm usage?

rocketmq-broker/src/processor/default_pull_message_result_handler.rs (1)

540-540: Ensure consistency in string conversion.

Changing client_address to a String by calling to_string() and then converting it into another type may introduce unnecessary allocations. Verify if this aligns with adjacent code for consistency and consider passing a borrowed string reference if feasible.

rocketmq-broker/src/processor/pop_message_processor.rs (3)

33-33: Import for initialization mode looks appropriate.

Adding ConsumeInitMode as an import aligns well with the logic that handles initialization offsets. No further issues identified.


39-39: Importing mix_all is consistent with usage.

This import for mix_all is used in the get_init_offset logic. No concerns found.


999-1033: Assess correctness of the new get_init_offset logic.

  1. Initialization logic: Conditionally sets offset to the min or max, or zero, depending on topic prefix and broker settings. This seems correct and matches the introduced ConsumeInitMode.
  2. Auto-commit: When init is true, the offset is immediately persisted. Confirm that this aligns with downstream usage and does not lead to unexpected side effects if multiple consumers attempt to initialize concurrently.
  3. Performance: The checks for messages in memory help optimize offset selection. Keep an eye on potential overhead if the number of topics or partitions grows significantly.

Overall, the logic appears valid for typical use cases.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project. rocketmq-broker crate
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature🚀] Implement PopMessageProcessor#get_init_offset method logic
3 participants