-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 112
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ISSUE #1949]♻️PopMessageProcessor supports process_request handle-5🚀 #1981
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉! 💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥! Note 🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥. |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1981 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 28.32% 28.32%
=======================================
Files 486 486
Lines 68356 68356
=======================================
Hits 19362 19362
Misses 48994 48994 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/pop_message_processor.rs (4)
437-437
: Use a meaningful and descriptive variable name.The variable
rest_num
is introduced here to keep track of the remaining messages. Consider renaming it to a clearer name likeremaining_messages
orremaining_count
for better readability.
480-480
: Avoid code duplication when forwardingrest_num
.Similar to the logic on line 458, this line forwards
rest_num
to another retry call. If both paths share logic, consider refactoring them into a helper function to reduce duplication.
521-521
: Enhance comment clarity.The comment explains the retry logic if the result is not full. Expanding it with the exact condition or rationale helps future maintainers quickly understand how and why the additional fetch is triggered.
613-613
: Add fallback logging for debugging.Defaulting to
PollingTimeout
is reasonable. Optionally add a debug or warning log indicating why this code path was triggered. This can help in diagnosing potential slow or hung polling operations.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/pop_message_processor.rs
(7 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/pop_message_processor.rs (7)
439-439
: Check correctness of retry logic assignment.
Here, rest_num
is overwritten based on need_retry_v1
. Verify that the two retry paths correctly aggregate the number of unprocessed messages, especially if partial consumption occurs before re-entering a retry path.
458-458
: Confirm consistent usage of rest_num
.
rest_num
is forwarded as a parameter to pop_msg_from_topic_by_name
. Ensure that the receiver method properly updates or uses rest_num
to reflect the remaining messages accurately.
485-486
: Clarify negative queue ID handling.
These lines treat negative queue_id
as a signal to read from all queues. Document or validate that negative IDs are never used for valid queue indices, to prevent confusion or hidden bugs.
500-500
: Pass rest_num
carefully.
Once again, rest_num
is passed to the next function. Confirm that the function properly updates this value to reflect newly discovered or consumed messages and that no partial read scenario is overlooked.
517-517
: Validate concurrency impact on rest_num
.
This line also forwards rest_num
. Check if any concurrent modifications occur between multiple calls. You might need synchronization if rest_num
updates in different threads or tasks.
573-573
: Properly handle empty vs. found messages.
This check sets the status to Found
if the resulting list is not empty. Confirm that code paths for partially retrieved messages (less than max requested) are correctly handled.
576-576
: Check notification condition.
notify_message_arriving
is triggered only when rest_num > 0
. Make sure this covers all scenarios. If rest_num
remains zero due to partial consumption or other logic, consider ensuring notifications are still sent only when actually needed.
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #1949
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit