[ISSUE #1684]🧪Add unit test for PopAckConstants #1686
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
🔊@shadowsoy 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥 |
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
AI review first
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
rocketmq-common/src/common/pop_ack_constants.rs (2)
35-43: Consider removing unnecessary #[inline] attributes.Both methods are simple and use already optimized string operations (
format!andstarts_with). The#[inline]attributes might not provide significant performance benefits and could potentially increase binary size. The Rust compiler is generally good at making inlining decisions automatically for such simple functions.- #[inline] pub fn build_cluster_revive_topic(cluster_name: &str) -> String { format!("{}{}", PopAckConstants::REVIVE_TOPIC, cluster_name) } - #[inline] pub fn is_start_with_revive_prefix(topic_name: &str) -> bool { topic_name.starts_with(PopAckConstants::REVIVE_TOPIC) }
46-86: Great test coverage! Consider adding edge cases.The test suite is comprehensive and well-structured. Consider adding these additional test cases:
#[test] fn build_cluster_revive_topic_handles_empty_cluster_name() { assert_eq!( PopAckConstants::build_cluster_revive_topic(""), PopAckConstants::REVIVE_TOPIC ); } #[test] fn build_cluster_revive_topic_handles_special_characters() { let cluster_name = "test@cluster#123"; assert_eq!( PopAckConstants::build_cluster_revive_topic(cluster_name), format!("{}{}", PopAckConstants::REVIVE_TOPIC, cluster_name) ); } #[test] fn build_cluster_revive_topic_handles_unicode() { let cluster_name = "测试集群"; assert_eq!( PopAckConstants::build_cluster_revive_topic(cluster_name), format!("{}{}", PopAckConstants::REVIVE_TOPIC, cluster_name) ); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
rocketmq-common/src/common/pop_ack_constants.rs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
rocketmq-common/src/common/pop_ack_constants.rs (2)
20-34: LGTM! Constants are well-defined and follow conventions.
The constants are appropriately named, have clear purposes, and follow Rust naming conventions.
1-86: Implementation successfully meets PR objectives.
The changes fulfill the requirements by adding comprehensive unit tests for the PopAckConstants module. The tests cover all functionality including methods and constant values, with both positive and negative test cases.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1686 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 27.94% 27.98% +0.04%
==========================================
Files 471 471
Lines 63280 63309 +29
==========================================
+ Hits 17683 17718 +35
+ Misses 45597 45591 -6 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #1684
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes