[ISSUE #1356]🧪Add unit test for CreateTopicRequestHeader #1357
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a test module for the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
🔊@Fly-cmd-ops 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥 |
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
AI review first
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/create_topic_request_header.rs (3)
187-274: Consider adding edge cases to strengthen test coverageWhile the test thoroughly verifies basic serialization, consider adding test cases for:
- Boundary values for numeric fields (e.g., MIN/MAX for read_queue_nums, write_queue_nums)
- Special permission combinations
- String fields containing special characters or Unicode
333-376: Consider additional variations for optional fields testingThe test effectively verifies behavior with all optional fields missing. Consider adding:
- Test cases with some optional fields present and others missing
- Test cases with empty strings for optional string fields
- Verification of default values for required fields when empty strings are provided
181-377: Overall test coverage is good with room for improvementThe test suite effectively covers the core functionality of
CreateTopicRequestHeader, meeting the objectives of issue #1356. The tests verify:
- Serialization of all fields
- Deserialization with complete data
- Handling of missing optional fields
To achieve comprehensive coverage, consider:
- Adding property-based tests for exhaustive testing
- Testing concurrent access if the struct is used in concurrent contexts
- Adding documentation comments to describe test scenarios
Would you like help implementing any of these suggested improvements?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/create_topic_request_header.rs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/create_topic_request_header.rs (1)
181-186: LGTM: Test module setup follows best practices
The test module is correctly configured with appropriate imports and test annotation.
| #[test] | ||
| fn create_topic_request_header_from_map() { | ||
| let mut map = HashMap::new(); | ||
| map.insert( | ||
| CheetahString::from_static_str(CreateTopicRequestHeader::TOPIC), | ||
| CheetahString::from("test_topic"), | ||
| ); | ||
| map.insert( | ||
| CheetahString::from_static_str(CreateTopicRequestHeader::DEFAULT_TOPIC), | ||
| CheetahString::from("default_topic"), | ||
| ); | ||
| map.insert( | ||
| CheetahString::from_static_str(CreateTopicRequestHeader::READ_QUEUE_NUMS), | ||
| CheetahString::from("4"), | ||
| ); | ||
| map.insert( | ||
| CheetahString::from_static_str(CreateTopicRequestHeader::WRITE_QUEUE_NUMS), | ||
| CheetahString::from("4"), | ||
| ); | ||
| map.insert( | ||
| CheetahString::from_static_str(CreateTopicRequestHeader::PERM), | ||
| CheetahString::from("6"), | ||
| ); | ||
| map.insert( | ||
| CheetahString::from_static_str(CreateTopicRequestHeader::TOPIC_FILTER_TYPE), | ||
| CheetahString::from("filter_type"), | ||
| ); | ||
| map.insert( | ||
| CheetahString::from_static_str(CreateTopicRequestHeader::TOPIC_SYS_FLAG), | ||
| CheetahString::from("1"), | ||
| ); | ||
| map.insert( | ||
| CheetahString::from_static_str(CreateTopicRequestHeader::ORDER), | ||
| CheetahString::from("true"), | ||
| ); | ||
| map.insert( | ||
| CheetahString::from_static_str(CreateTopicRequestHeader::ATTRIBUTES), | ||
| CheetahString::from("attributes"), | ||
| ); | ||
| map.insert( | ||
| CheetahString::from_static_str(CreateTopicRequestHeader::FORCE), | ||
| CheetahString::from("true"), | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| let header = <CreateTopicRequestHeader as FromMap>::from(&map).unwrap(); | ||
| assert_eq!(header.topic, CheetahString::from("test_topic")); | ||
| assert_eq!(header.default_topic, CheetahString::from("default_topic")); | ||
| assert_eq!(header.read_queue_nums, 4); | ||
| assert_eq!(header.write_queue_nums, 4); | ||
| assert_eq!(header.perm, 6); | ||
| assert_eq!(header.topic_filter_type, CheetahString::from("filter_type")); | ||
| assert_eq!(header.topic_sys_flag, Some(1)); | ||
| assert_eq!(header.order, true); | ||
| assert_eq!(header.attributes, Some(CheetahString::from("attributes"))); | ||
| assert_eq!(header.force, Some(true)); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling test cases
Consider adding test cases for error scenarios:
- Invalid numeric values in string fields
- Invalid boolean values
- Malformed input data
Example test case to add:
#[test]
fn create_topic_request_header_from_map_invalid_values() {
let mut map = HashMap::new();
map.insert(
CheetahString::from_static_str(CreateTopicRequestHeader::READ_QUEUE_NUMS),
CheetahString::from("invalid_number"),
);
// Verify the behavior with invalid input
let header = <CreateTopicRequestHeader as FromMap>::from(&map);
// Assert expected default or error handling behavior
}
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1357 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 20.49% 20.92% +0.43%
==========================================
Files 434 434
Lines 54877 55062 +185
==========================================
+ Hits 11245 11524 +279
+ Misses 43632 43538 -94 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
approved
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #1356
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
CreateTopicRequestHeaderstruct.