-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 113
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ISSUE #1510]♻️Refactor GetBrokerMemberGroupRequestHeader with derive marco RequestHeaderCodec #1518
Conversation
…rive marco RequestHeaderCodec
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
🔊@ButterflyEffect1991 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥 |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1518 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 24.70% 24.75% +0.04%
==========================================
Files 450 450
Lines 59385 59376 -9
==========================================
+ Hits 14672 14698 +26
+ Misses 44713 44678 -35 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/namesrv/broker_request.rs (1)
315-341
: Enhance test coverageWhile the current tests are good, consider adding:
- Negative test cases to verify the
#[required]
attribute behavior- Serialization/deserialization tests to verify RequestHeaderCodec functionality
Example test cases to add:
#[test] #[should_panic(expected = "required")] fn new_should_fail_with_null_values() { let _header = GetBrokerMemberGroupRequestHeader { cluster_name: CheetahString::default(), broker_name: CheetahString::default(), }; } #[test] fn test_serialization_deserialization() { let header = GetBrokerMemberGroupRequestHeader::new("testCluster", "testBroker"); let serialized = serde_json::to_string(&header).unwrap(); let deserialized: GetBrokerMemberGroupRequestHeader = serde_json::from_str(&serialized).unwrap(); assert_eq!(header.cluster_name, deserialized.cluster_name); assert_eq!(header.broker_name, deserialized.broker_name); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/namesrv/broker_request.rs
(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/namesrv/broker_request.rs (3)
21-21
: LGTM: Import added for RequestHeaderCodec derive macro
The import is correctly placed and aligns with the PR objective of using the RequestHeaderCodec derive macro.
266-267
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove commented out code
Instead of keeping the commented code, it should be removed since:
- The functionality is now handled by the RequestHeaderCodec derive macro
- Git history preserves the old implementation if needed
- Commented code adds noise and maintenance overhead
Also, let's verify that the derive macro provides equivalent functionality:
Also applies to: 281-313
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see multiple examples of RequestHeaderCodec
usage across the codebase. The derive macro is consistently used alongside Serialize
, Deserialize
, and other common derives. Looking at the examples, particularly in files like send_message_request_header.rs
and others, the macro handles the serialization/deserialization of camelCase fields, which is the same functionality that was previously handled by the commented constants.
Remove commented code blocks
The commented code can be safely removed since:
- The
RequestHeaderCodec
derive macro is proven to handle the field naming consistently across multiple similar request headers - All examples show the macro working correctly with camelCase field serialization
- Git history will preserve the old implementation if needed for reference
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find other examples of RequestHeaderCodec usage to confirm behavior
rg -l "#\[derive\([^)]*RequestHeaderCodec[^)]*\)\]" | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg -B 2 -A 10 "#\[derive\([^)]*RequestHeaderCodec[^)]*\)\]" "$file"
done
Length of output: 8528
256-262
: Verify impact of making fields required
The addition of #[required]
attributes to cluster_name
and broker_name
is a breaking change that enforces stricter validation. This could affect existing code that might be creating instances with default/empty values.
Let's check for potential impact:
✅ Verification successful
No breaking change impact from adding required attributes
The verification shows that the struct is used safely throughout the codebase:
- The only direct instantiation is through the
new()
constructor method which always provides both required fields - No usage of
default()
was found in the codebase - The struct is primarily used in the namesrv processor where it's properly decoded from request headers that must contain these fields
- Test cases demonstrate proper initialization with both empty and non-empty values
The addition of #[required]
attributes aligns with the actual usage pattern in the codebase and formalizes the existing implicit contract that these fields must always be present.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for direct struct instantiations that might be affected
rg -l "GetBrokerMemberGroupRequestHeader\s*{\s*" | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg -A 5 "GetBrokerMemberGroupRequestHeader\s*{\s*" "$file"
done
# Search for Default trait usage
rg -l "GetBrokerMemberGroupRequestHeader::default()" | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg -A 2 "GetBrokerMemberGroupRequestHeader::default()" "$file"
done
Length of output: 295
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for direct struct instantiations that might be affected
rg -l "GetBrokerMemberGroupRequestHeader *{" | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg -A 5 "GetBrokerMemberGroupRequestHeader *{" "$file"
done
# Search for Default trait usage
rg "GetBrokerMemberGroupRequestHeader::default"
# Search for any usage of this struct
rg "GetBrokerMemberGroupRequestHeader" -A 3
Length of output: 4979
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #1510
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
GetBrokerMemberGroupRequestHeader
functionality with new required fields forcluster_name
andbroker_name
.GetBrokerMemberGroupRequestHeader
instances.Bug Fixes