-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
selftests: mptcp_join tests are creating warnings #86
Labels
Comments
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 6, 2020
The commit eb1f002 ("lockdep,trace: Expose tracepoints"), started to expose us for tracepoints. This lead to the following RCU splat on an ARM64 Qcom board. [ 5.529634] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 5.537307] sdhci-pltfm: SDHCI platform and OF driver helper [ 5.541092] 5.9.0-rc3 #86 Not tainted [ 5.541098] ----------------------------- [ 5.541105] ../include/trace/events/lock.h:37 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! [ 5.541110] [ 5.541110] other info that might help us debug this: [ 5.541110] [ 5.541116] [ 5.541116] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 5.541122] RCU used illegally from extended quiescent state! [ 5.541129] no locks held by swapper/0/0. [ 5.541134] [ 5.541134] stack backtrace: [ 5.541143] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc3 #86 [ 5.541149] Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. APQ 8016 SBC (DT) [ 5.541157] Call trace: [ 5.568185] sdhci_msm 7864900.sdhci: Got CD GPIO [ 5.574186] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1c8 [ 5.574206] show_stack+0x14/0x20 [ 5.574229] dump_stack+0xe8/0x154 [ 5.574250] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xd4/0xf8 [ 5.574269] lock_acquire+0x3f0/0x460 [ 5.574292] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x80/0xb0 [ 5.574314] __pm_runtime_suspend+0x4c/0x188 [ 5.574341] psci_enter_domain_idle_state+0x40/0xa0 [ 5.574362] cpuidle_enter_state+0xc0/0x610 [ 5.646487] cpuidle_enter+0x38/0x50 [ 5.650651] call_cpuidle+0x18/0x40 [ 5.654467] do_idle+0x228/0x278 [ 5.657678] cpu_startup_entry+0x24/0x70 [ 5.661153] rest_init+0x1a4/0x278 [ 5.665061] arch_call_rest_init+0xc/0x14 [ 5.668272] start_kernel+0x508/0x540 Following the path in pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend() from psci_enter_domain_idle_state(), it seems like we end up using the RCU. Therefore, let's simply silence the splat by informing the RCU about it with RCU_NONIDLE. Note that, this is a temporary solution. Instead we should strive to avoid using RCU_NONIDLE (and similar), but rather push rcu_idle_enter|exit() further down, closer to the arch specific code. However, as the CPU PM notifiers are also using the RCU, additional rework is needed. Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
jenkins-tessares
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 24, 2021
Liajian reported a bug_on hit on a ThunderX2 arm64 server with FastLinQ QL41000 ethernet controller: BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/0:4/531/0x00000200 [qed_probe:488()]hw prepare failed kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c:2355! Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP CPU: 0 PID: 531 Comm: kworker/0:4 Tainted: G W 5.4.0-77-generic #86-Ubuntu pstate: 00400009 (nzcv daif +PAN -UAO) Call trace: vunmap+0x4c/0x50 iounmap+0x48/0x58 qed_free_pci+0x60/0x80 [qed] qed_probe+0x35c/0x688 [qed] __qede_probe+0x88/0x5c8 [qede] qede_probe+0x60/0xe0 [qede] local_pci_probe+0x48/0xa0 work_for_cpu_fn+0x24/0x38 process_one_work+0x1d0/0x468 worker_thread+0x238/0x4e0 kthread+0xf0/0x118 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 In this case, qed_hw_prepare() returns error due to hw/fw error, but in theory work queue should be in process context instead of interrupt. The root cause might be the unpaired spin_{un}lock_bh() in _qed_mcp_cmd_and_union(), which causes botton half is disabled incorrectly. Reported-by: Lijian Zhang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jia He <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
jenkins-tessares
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 24, 2021
In some cases skb head could be locked and entire header data is pulled from skb. When skb_zerocopy() called in such cases, following BUG is triggered. This patch fixes it by copying entire skb in such cases. This could be optimized incase this is performance bottleneck. ---8<--- kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:2961! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI CPU: 2 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/2 Tainted: G OE 5.4.0-77-generic #86-Ubuntu Hardware name: OpenStack Foundation OpenStack Nova, BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:skb_zerocopy+0x37a/0x3a0 RSP: 0018:ffffbcc70013ca38 EFLAGS: 00010246 Call Trace: <IRQ> queue_userspace_packet+0x2af/0x5e0 [openvswitch] ovs_dp_upcall+0x3d/0x60 [openvswitch] ovs_dp_process_packet+0x125/0x150 [openvswitch] ovs_vport_receive+0x77/0xd0 [openvswitch] netdev_port_receive+0x87/0x130 [openvswitch] netdev_frame_hook+0x4b/0x60 [openvswitch] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x2b4/0xc90 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x3f/0xa0 __netif_receive_skb+0x18/0x60 process_backlog+0xa9/0x160 net_rx_action+0x142/0x390 __do_softirq+0xe1/0x2d6 irq_exit+0xae/0xb0 do_IRQ+0x5a/0xf0 common_interrupt+0xf/0xf Code that triggered BUG: int skb_zerocopy(struct sk_buff *to, struct sk_buff *from, int len, int hlen) { int i, j = 0; int plen = 0; /* length of skb->head fragment */ int ret; struct page *page; unsigned int offset; BUG_ON(!from->head_frag && !hlen); Signed-off-by: Pravin B Shelar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
jenkins-tessares
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 18, 2022
…ging The following bug is reported to be triggered when starting X on x86-32 system with i915: [ 225.777375] kernel BUG at mm/memory.c:2664! [ 225.777391] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 225.777405] CPU: 0 PID: 2402 Comm: Xorg Not tainted 6.1.0-rc3-bdg+ #86 [ 225.777415] Hardware name: /8I865G775-G, BIOS F1 08/29/2006 [ 225.777421] EIP: __apply_to_page_range+0x24d/0x31c [ 225.777437] Code: ff ff 8b 55 e8 8b 45 cc e8 0a 11 ec ff 89 d8 83 c4 28 5b 5e 5f 5d c3 81 7d e0 a0 ef 96 c1 74 ad 8b 45 d0 e8 2d 83 49 00 eb a3 <0f> 0b 25 00 f0 ff ff 81 eb 00 00 00 40 01 c3 8b 45 ec 8b 00 e8 76 [ 225.777446] EAX: 00000001 EBX: c53a3b58 ECX: b5c00000 EDX: c258aa00 [ 225.777454] ESI: b5c00000 EDI: b5900000 EBP: c4b0fdb4 ESP: c4b0fd80 [ 225.777462] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00010202 [ 225.777470] CR0: 80050033 CR2: b5900000 CR3: 053a3000 CR4: 000006d0 [ 225.777479] Call Trace: [ 225.777486] ? i915_memcpy_init_early+0x63/0x63 [i915] [ 225.777684] apply_to_page_range+0x21/0x27 [ 225.777694] ? i915_memcpy_init_early+0x63/0x63 [i915] [ 225.777870] remap_io_mapping+0x49/0x75 [i915] [ 225.778046] ? i915_memcpy_init_early+0x63/0x63 [i915] [ 225.778220] ? mutex_unlock+0xb/0xd [ 225.778231] ? i915_vma_pin_fence+0x6d/0xf7 [i915] [ 225.778420] vm_fault_gtt+0x2a9/0x8f1 [i915] [ 225.778644] ? lock_is_held_type+0x56/0xe7 [ 225.778655] ? lock_is_held_type+0x7a/0xe7 [ 225.778663] ? 0xc1000000 [ 225.778670] __do_fault+0x21/0x6a [ 225.778679] handle_mm_fault+0x708/0xb21 [ 225.778686] ? mt_find+0x21e/0x5ae [ 225.778696] exc_page_fault+0x185/0x705 [ 225.778704] ? doublefault_shim+0x127/0x127 [ 225.778715] handle_exception+0x130/0x130 [ 225.778723] EIP: 0xb700468a Recently pud_huge() got aware of non-present entry by commit 3a194f3 ("mm/hugetlb: make pud_huge() and follow_huge_pud() aware of non-present pud entry") to handle some special states of gigantic page. However, it's overlooked that pud_none() always returns false when running with 2-level paging, and as a result pud_huge() can return true pointlessly. Introduce "#if CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS > 2" to pud_huge() to deal with this. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Fixes: 3a194f3 ("mm/hugetlb: make pud_huge() and follow_huge_pud() aware of non-present pud entry") Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <[email protected]> Reported-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> Tested-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <[email protected]> Cc: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]> Cc: Liu Shixin <[email protected]> Cc: Mike Kravetz <[email protected]> Cc: Muchun Song <[email protected]> Cc: Oscar Salvador <[email protected]> Cc: Yang Shi <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
jenkins-tessares
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 21, 2023
The inline assembly for arm64's cmpxchg_double*() implementations use a +Q constraint to hazard against other accesses to the memory location being exchanged. However, the pointer passed to the constraint is a pointer to unsigned long, and thus the hazard only applies to the first 8 bytes of the location. GCC can take advantage of this, assuming that other portions of the location are unchanged, leading to a number of potential problems. This is similar to what we fixed back in commit: fee960b ("arm64: xchg: hazard against entire exchange variable") ... but we forgot to adjust cmpxchg_double*() similarly at the same time. The same problem applies, as demonstrated with the following test: | struct big { | u64 lo, hi; | } __aligned(128); | | unsigned long foo(struct big *b) | { | u64 hi_old, hi_new; | | hi_old = b->hi; | cmpxchg_double_local(&b->lo, &b->hi, 0x12, 0x34, 0x56, 0x78); | hi_new = b->hi; | | return hi_old ^ hi_new; | } ... which GCC 12.1.0 compiles as: | 0000000000000000 <foo>: | 0: d503233f paciasp | 4: aa0003e4 mov x4, x0 | 8: 1400000e b 40 <foo+0x40> | c: d2800240 mov x0, #0x12 // #18 | 10: d2800681 mov x1, #0x34 // #52 | 14: aa0003e5 mov x5, x0 | 18: aa0103e6 mov x6, x1 | 1c: d2800ac2 mov x2, #0x56 // #86 | 20: d2800f03 mov x3, #0x78 // #120 | 24: 48207c82 casp x0, x1, x2, x3, [x4] | 28: ca050000 eor x0, x0, x5 | 2c: ca060021 eor x1, x1, x6 | 30: aa010000 orr x0, x0, x1 | 34: d2800000 mov x0, #0x0 // #0 <--- BANG | 38: d50323bf autiasp | 3c: d65f03c0 ret | 40: d2800240 mov x0, #0x12 // #18 | 44: d2800681 mov x1, #0x34 // #52 | 48: d2800ac2 mov x2, #0x56 // #86 | 4c: d2800f03 mov x3, #0x78 // #120 | 50: f9800091 prfm pstl1strm, [x4] | 54: c87f1885 ldxp x5, x6, [x4] | 58: ca0000a5 eor x5, x5, x0 | 5c: ca0100c6 eor x6, x6, x1 | 60: aa0600a6 orr x6, x5, x6 | 64: b5000066 cbnz x6, 70 <foo+0x70> | 68: c8250c82 stxp w5, x2, x3, [x4] | 6c: 35ffff45 cbnz w5, 54 <foo+0x54> | 70: d2800000 mov x0, #0x0 // #0 <--- BANG | 74: d50323bf autiasp | 78: d65f03c0 ret Notice that at the lines with "BANG" comments, GCC has assumed that the higher 8 bytes are unchanged by the cmpxchg_double() call, and that `hi_old ^ hi_new` can be reduced to a constant zero, for both LSE and LL/SC versions of cmpxchg_double(). This patch fixes the issue by passing a pointer to __uint128_t into the +Q constraint, ensuring that the compiler hazards against the entire 16 bytes being modified. With this change, GCC 12.1.0 compiles the above test as: | 0000000000000000 <foo>: | 0: f9400407 ldr x7, [x0, #8] | 4: d503233f paciasp | 8: aa0003e4 mov x4, x0 | c: 1400000f b 48 <foo+0x48> | 10: d2800240 mov x0, #0x12 // #18 | 14: d2800681 mov x1, #0x34 // #52 | 18: aa0003e5 mov x5, x0 | 1c: aa0103e6 mov x6, x1 | 20: d2800ac2 mov x2, #0x56 // #86 | 24: d2800f03 mov x3, #0x78 // #120 | 28: 48207c82 casp x0, x1, x2, x3, [x4] | 2c: ca050000 eor x0, x0, x5 | 30: ca060021 eor x1, x1, x6 | 34: aa010000 orr x0, x0, x1 | 38: f9400480 ldr x0, [x4, #8] | 3c: d50323bf autiasp | 40: ca0000e0 eor x0, x7, x0 | 44: d65f03c0 ret | 48: d2800240 mov x0, #0x12 // #18 | 4c: d2800681 mov x1, #0x34 // #52 | 50: d2800ac2 mov x2, #0x56 // #86 | 54: d2800f03 mov x3, #0x78 // #120 | 58: f9800091 prfm pstl1strm, [x4] | 5c: c87f1885 ldxp x5, x6, [x4] | 60: ca0000a5 eor x5, x5, x0 | 64: ca0100c6 eor x6, x6, x1 | 68: aa0600a6 orr x6, x5, x6 | 6c: b5000066 cbnz x6, 78 <foo+0x78> | 70: c8250c82 stxp w5, x2, x3, [x4] | 74: 35ffff45 cbnz w5, 5c <foo+0x5c> | 78: f9400480 ldr x0, [x4, #8] | 7c: d50323bf autiasp | 80: ca0000e0 eor x0, x7, x0 | 84: d65f03c0 ret ... sampling the high 8 bytes before and after the cmpxchg, and performing an EOR, as we'd expect. For backporting, I've tested this atop linux-4.9.y with GCC 5.5.0. Note that linux-4.9.y is oldest currently supported stable release, and mandates GCC 5.1+. Unfortunately I couldn't get a GCC 5.1 binary to run on my machines due to library incompatibilities. I've also used a standalone test to check that we can use a __uint128_t pointer in a +Q constraint at least as far back as GCC 4.8.5 and LLVM 3.9.1. Fixes: 5284e1b ("arm64: xchg: Implement cmpxchg_double") Fixes: e9a4b79 ("arm64: cmpxchg_dbl: patch in lse instructions when supported by the CPU") Reported-by: Boqun Feng <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y6DEfQXymYVgL3oJ@boqun-archlinux/ Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/ Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> Cc: Steve Capper <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 20, 2024
Recent additions in BPF like cpu v4 instructions, test_bpf module exhibits the following failures: test_bpf: #82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #83 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #85 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #86 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_W jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #165 ALU_SDIV_X: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #166 ALU_SDIV_K: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #169 ALU_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #170 ALU_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #172 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #313 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 301 PASS test_bpf: #314 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 555 PASS test_bpf: #315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 268 PASS test_bpf: #316 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 269 PASS test_bpf: #317 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 460 PASS test_bpf: #318 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 320 PASS test_bpf: #319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 222 PASS test_bpf: #320 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 273 PASS test_bpf: #344 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_B eBPF filter opcode 0091 (@5) unsupported jited:0 432 PASS test_bpf: #345 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_H eBPF filter opcode 0089 (@5) unsupported jited:0 381 PASS test_bpf: #346 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_W eBPF filter opcode 0081 (@5) unsupported jited:0 505 PASS test_bpf: #490 JMP32_JA: Unconditional jump: if (true) return 1 eBPF filter opcode 0006 (@1) unsupported jited:0 261 PASS test_bpf: Summary: 1040 PASSED, 10 FAILED, [924/1038 JIT'ed] Fix them by adding missing processing. Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Link: https://msgid.link/91de862dda99d170697eb79ffb478678af7e0b27.1709652689.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
When launching
mptcp_join.sh
selftests with a debug kernel [1], I got these warnings 10 times:[1] Compared to a non debug kernel, the kconfig contains:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: