Received DATA_FIN+FIN does not trigger wakeup #84
Assignees
Labels
Comments
|
@mjmartineau thx for the bug report! I tried your patch you sent to the ML but it seems not fixing my issue with Packetdrill (cc @dcaratti ). |
|
Thanks @matttbe, I wasn't sure the packetdrill issue would be fixed by this. |
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this issue
Sep 21, 2020
When receiving a DATA_FIN MPTCP option on a TCP FIN packet, the DATA_FIN information would be stored but the MPTCP worker did not get scheduled. In turn, the MPTCP socket state would remain in TCP_ESTABLISHED and no blocked operations would be awakened. TCP FIN packets are seen by the MPTCP socket when moving skbs out of the subflow receive queues, so schedule the MPTCP worker when a skb with DATA_FIN but no data payload is moved from a subflow queue. Other cases (DATA_FIN on a bare TCP ACK or on a packet with data payload) are already handled. Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#84 Fixes: 43b54c6 ("mptcp: Use full MPTCP-level disconnect state machine") Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this issue
Sep 24, 2020
When receiving a DATA_FIN MPTCP option on a TCP FIN packet, the DATA_FIN information would be stored but the MPTCP worker did not get scheduled. In turn, the MPTCP socket state would remain in TCP_ESTABLISHED and no blocked operations would be awakened. TCP FIN packets are seen by the MPTCP socket when moving skbs out of the subflow receive queues, so schedule the MPTCP worker when a skb with DATA_FIN but no data payload is moved from a subflow queue. Other cases (DATA_FIN on a bare TCP ACK or on a packet with data payload) are already handled. Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#84 Fixes: 43b54c6 ("mptcp: Use full MPTCP-level disconnect state machine") Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
|
Merged to -net: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/ |
jenkins-tessares
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 13, 2022
IPv6 addresses which are used for tunnels are stored in a hash table with reference counting. When a new GRE tunnel is configured, the driver is notified and configures it in hardware. Currently, any change in the tunnel is not applied in the driver. It means that if the remote address is changed, the driver is not aware of this change and the first address will be used. This behavior results in a warning [1] in scenarios such as the following: # ip link add name gre1 type ip6gre local 2000::3 remote 2000::fffe tos inherit ttl inherit # ip link set name gre1 type ip6gre local 2000::3 remote 2000::ffff ttl inherit # ip link delete gre1 The change of the address is not applied in the driver. Currently, the driver uses the remote address which is stored in the 'parms' of the overlay device. When the tunnel is removed, the new IPv6 address is used, the driver tries to release it, but as it is not aware of the change, this address is not configured and it warns about releasing non existing IPv6 address. Fix it by using the IPv6 address which is cached in the IPIP entry, this address is the last one that the driver used, so even in cases such the above, the first address will be released, without any warning. [1]: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 2197 at drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c:2920 mlxsw_sp_ipv6_addr_put+0x146/0x220 [mlxsw_spectrum] ... CPU: 1 PID: 2197 Comm: ip Not tainted 5.17.0-rc8-custom-95062-gc1e5ded51a9a #84 Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN4700/VMOD0010, BIOS 5.11 07/12/2021 RIP: 0010:mlxsw_sp_ipv6_addr_put+0x146/0x220 [mlxsw_spectrum] ... Call Trace: <TASK> mlxsw_sp2_ipip_rem_addr_unset_gre6+0xf1/0x120 [mlxsw_spectrum] mlxsw_sp_netdevice_ipip_ol_event+0xdb/0x640 [mlxsw_spectrum] mlxsw_sp_netdevice_event+0xc4/0x850 [mlxsw_spectrum] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x3c/0x50 call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x2f/0x80 unregister_netdevice_many+0x311/0x6d0 rtnl_dellink+0x136/0x360 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x12f/0x380 netlink_rcv_skb+0x49/0xf0 netlink_unicast+0x233/0x340 netlink_sendmsg+0x202/0x440 ____sys_sendmsg+0x1f3/0x220 ___sys_sendmsg+0x70/0xb0 __sys_sendmsg+0x54/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae Fixes: e846efe ("mlxsw: spectrum: Add hash table for IPv6 address mapping") Reported-by: Maksym Yaremchuk <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Amit Cohen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 9, 2024
Many devices with a single alternate setting do not have a Valid Alternate Setting Control and validation performed by validate_sample_rate_table_v2v3() doesn't work on them and is not really needed. So check the presense of control before sending altsetting validation requests. MOTU Microbook IIc is suffering the most without this check. It takes up to 40 seconds to bootup due to how slow it switches sampling rates: [ 2659.164824] usb 3-2: New USB device found, idVendor=07fd, idProduct=0004, bcdDevice= 0.60 [ 2659.164827] usb 3-2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=0 [ 2659.164829] usb 3-2: Product: MicroBook IIc [ 2659.164830] usb 3-2: Manufacturer: MOTU [ 2659.166204] usb 3-2: Found last interface = 3 [ 2679.322298] usb 3-2: No valid sample rate available for 1:1, assuming a firmware bug [ 2679.322306] usb 3-2: 1:1: add audio endpoint 0x3 [ 2679.322321] usb 3-2: Creating new data endpoint #3 [ 2679.322552] usb 3-2: 1:1 Set sample rate 96000, clock 1 [ 2684.362250] usb 3-2: 2:1: cannot get freq (v2/v3): err -110 [ 2694.444700] usb 3-2: No valid sample rate available for 2:1, assuming a firmware bug [ 2694.444707] usb 3-2: 2:1: add audio endpoint 0x84 [ 2694.444721] usb 3-2: Creating new data endpoint #84 [ 2699.482103] usb 3-2: 2:1 Set sample rate 96000, clock 1 Signed-off-by: Alexander Tsoy <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 20, 2024
Recent additions in BPF like cpu v4 instructions, test_bpf module exhibits the following failures: test_bpf: #82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #83 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #85 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #86 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_W jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #165 ALU_SDIV_X: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #166 ALU_SDIV_K: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #169 ALU_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #170 ALU_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #172 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #313 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 301 PASS test_bpf: #314 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 555 PASS test_bpf: #315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 268 PASS test_bpf: #316 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 269 PASS test_bpf: #317 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 460 PASS test_bpf: #318 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 320 PASS test_bpf: #319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 222 PASS test_bpf: #320 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 273 PASS test_bpf: #344 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_B eBPF filter opcode 0091 (@5) unsupported jited:0 432 PASS test_bpf: #345 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_H eBPF filter opcode 0089 (@5) unsupported jited:0 381 PASS test_bpf: #346 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_W eBPF filter opcode 0081 (@5) unsupported jited:0 505 PASS test_bpf: #490 JMP32_JA: Unconditional jump: if (true) return 1 eBPF filter opcode 0006 (@1) unsupported jited:0 261 PASS test_bpf: Summary: 1040 PASSED, 10 FAILED, [924/1038 JIT'ed] Fix them by adding missing processing. Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Link: https://msgid.link/91de862dda99d170697eb79ffb478678af7e0b27.1709652689.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
PlaidCat
added a commit
to ctrliq/kernel-src-tree
that referenced
this issue
Sep 12, 2024
jira LE-1907 Rebuild_History Non-Buildable kernel-4.18.0-294.el8 commit-author Mat Martineau <[email protected]> commit ef59b19 When receiving a DATA_FIN MPTCP option on a TCP FIN packet, the DATA_FIN information would be stored but the MPTCP worker did not get scheduled. In turn, the MPTCP socket state would remain in TCP_ESTABLISHED and no blocked operations would be awakened. TCP FIN packets are seen by the MPTCP socket when moving skbs out of the subflow receive queues, so schedule the MPTCP worker when a skb with DATA_FIN but no data payload is moved from a subflow queue. Other cases (DATA_FIN on a bare TCP ACK or on a packet with data payload) are already handled. Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#84 Fixes: 43b54c6 ("mptcp: Use full MPTCP-level disconnect state machine") Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit ef59b19) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Maple <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 13, 2024
Add 3 test cases for skb dynptr used in tp_btf: - test_dynptr_skb_tp_btf: use skb dynptr in tp_btf and make sure it is read-only. - skb_invalid_ctx_fentry/skb_invalid_ctx_fexit: bpf_dynptr_from_skb should fail in fentry/fexit. In test_dynptr_skb_tp_btf, to trigger the tracepoint in kfree_skb, test_pkt_access is used for its test_run, as in kfree_skb.c. Because the test process is different from others, a new setup type is defined, i.e., SETUP_SKB_PROG_TP. The result is like: $ ./test_progs -t 'dynptr/test_dynptr_skb_tp_btf' #84/14 dynptr/test_dynptr_skb_tp_btf:OK #84 dynptr:OK #127 kfunc_dynptr_param:OK Summary: 2/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED $ ./test_progs -t 'dynptr/skb_invalid_ctx_f' #84/85 dynptr/skb_invalid_ctx_fentry:OK #84/86 dynptr/skb_invalid_ctx_fexit:OK #84 dynptr:OK #127 kfunc_dynptr_param:OK Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Also fix two coding style nits (change spaces to tabs). Signed-off-by: Philo Lu <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 22, 2024
Devices block sizes may change. One of these cases is a loop device by using ioctl LOOP_SET_BLOCK_SIZE. While this may cause other issues like IO being rejected, in the case of hfsplus, it will allocate a block by using that size and potentially write out-of-bounds when hfsplus_read_wrapper calls hfsplus_submit_bio and the latter function reads a different io_size. Using a new min_io_size initally set to sb_min_blocksize works for the purposes of the original fix, since it will be set to the max between HFSPLUS_SECTOR_SIZE and the first seen logical block size. We still use the max between HFSPLUS_SECTOR_SIZE and min_io_size in case the latter is not initialized. Tested by mounting an hfsplus filesystem with loop block sizes 512, 1024 and 4096. The produced KASAN report before the fix looks like this: [ 419.944641] ================================================================== [ 419.945655] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in hfsplus_read_wrapper+0x659/0xa0a [ 419.946703] Read of size 2 at addr ffff88800721fc00 by task repro/10678 [ 419.947612] [ 419.947846] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 10678 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5-00008-gdf56e0f2f3ca #84 [ 419.949007] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 [ 419.950035] Call Trace: [ 419.950384] <TASK> [ 419.950676] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x78 [ 419.951212] ? hfsplus_read_wrapper+0x659/0xa0a [ 419.951830] print_report+0x14c/0x49e [ 419.952361] ? __virt_addr_valid+0x267/0x278 [ 419.952979] ? kmem_cache_debug_flags+0xc/0x1d [ 419.953561] ? hfsplus_read_wrapper+0x659/0xa0a [ 419.954231] kasan_report+0x89/0xb0 [ 419.954748] ? hfsplus_read_wrapper+0x659/0xa0a [ 419.955367] hfsplus_read_wrapper+0x659/0xa0a [ 419.955948] ? __pfx_hfsplus_read_wrapper+0x10/0x10 [ 419.956618] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x59/0x1a9 [ 419.957214] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1a/0x2e [ 419.957772] hfsplus_fill_super+0x348/0x1590 [ 419.958355] ? hlock_class+0x4c/0x109 [ 419.958867] ? __pfx_hfsplus_fill_super+0x10/0x10 [ 419.959499] ? __pfx_string+0x10/0x10 [ 419.960006] ? lock_acquire+0x3e2/0x454 [ 419.960532] ? bdev_name.constprop.0+0xce/0x243 [ 419.961129] ? __pfx_bdev_name.constprop.0+0x10/0x10 [ 419.961799] ? pointer+0x3f0/0x62f [ 419.962277] ? __pfx_pointer+0x10/0x10 [ 419.962761] ? vsnprintf+0x6c4/0xfba [ 419.963178] ? __pfx_vsnprintf+0x10/0x10 [ 419.963621] ? setup_bdev_super+0x376/0x3b3 [ 419.964029] ? snprintf+0x9d/0xd2 [ 419.964344] ? __pfx_snprintf+0x10/0x10 [ 419.964675] ? lock_acquired+0x45c/0x5e9 [ 419.965016] ? set_blocksize+0x139/0x1c1 [ 419.965381] ? sb_set_blocksize+0x6d/0xae [ 419.965742] ? __pfx_hfsplus_fill_super+0x10/0x10 [ 419.966179] mount_bdev+0x12f/0x1bf [ 419.966512] ? __pfx_mount_bdev+0x10/0x10 [ 419.966886] ? vfs_parse_fs_string+0xce/0x111 [ 419.967293] ? __pfx_vfs_parse_fs_string+0x10/0x10 [ 419.967702] ? __pfx_hfsplus_mount+0x10/0x10 [ 419.968073] legacy_get_tree+0x104/0x178 [ 419.968414] vfs_get_tree+0x86/0x296 [ 419.968751] path_mount+0xba3/0xd0b [ 419.969157] ? __pfx_path_mount+0x10/0x10 [ 419.969594] ? kmem_cache_free+0x1e2/0x260 [ 419.970311] do_mount+0x99/0xe0 [ 419.970630] ? __pfx_do_mount+0x10/0x10 [ 419.971008] __do_sys_mount+0x199/0x1c9 [ 419.971397] do_syscall_64+0xd0/0x135 [ 419.971761] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 419.972233] RIP: 0033:0x7c3cb812972e [ 419.972564] Code: 48 8b 0d f5 46 0d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 49 89 ca b8 a5 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d c2 46 0d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [ 419.974371] RSP: 002b:00007ffe30632548 EFLAGS: 00000286 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5 [ 419.975048] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffe306328d8 RCX: 00007c3cb812972e [ 419.975701] RDX: 0000000020000000 RSI: 0000000020000c80 RDI: 00007ffe306325d0 [ 419.976363] RBP: 00007ffe30632720 R08: 00007ffe30632610 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 419.977034] R10: 0000000000200008 R11: 0000000000000286 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 419.977713] R13: 00007ffe306328e8 R14: 00005a0eb298bc68 R15: 00007c3cb8356000 [ 419.978375] </TASK> [ 419.978589] Fixes: 6596528 ("hfsplus: ensure bio requests are not smaller than the hardware sectors") Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
When receiving a "bare DATA_FIN" on a FIN packet (no data payload), the MPTCP worker thread does not get scheduled. If userspace is blocked on read, it will remain blocked.
Root cause is that the check for a DATA_FIN on an ack packet does not account for the sequence number of the FIN - it checks for seq == end_seq. Also need to look at possibly scheduling a wakeup in other places that the DATA_FIN information is stored for processing by the worker thread.
This affects v5.9-rc3 (current release candidate) and earlier in the 5.9 series, and will require a -net fix.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: