Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Chore] v1.6.0 Docs Update #632

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 24, 2020
Merged

[Chore] v1.6.0 Docs Update #632

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 24, 2020

Conversation

grahamhency
Copy link
Contributor

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
    Tests for the changes have been added
  • Docs have been added or updated

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Style Update (CSS)
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Docs target v1.5.9 of Goponents

What is the new behavior?

Changed to target v1.6.0 and changes for that version

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

@grahamhency grahamhency requested a review from eligolding July 23, 2020 20:51
@grahamhency grahamhency mentioned this pull request Jul 24, 2020
Merged
@grahamhency
Copy link
Contributor Author

Travis is not reporting, but is successful. Merging.

@grahamhency grahamhency merged commit d4d0f27 into dev Jul 24, 2020
@grahamhency grahamhency deleted the chore_v1.6.0_docs_update branch July 24, 2020 15:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@eligolding eligolding eligolding left review comments

Assignees

@eligolding eligolding

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@grahamhency @eligolding