Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expose verify_mode in Conduit_async #298

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 17, 2019

Conversation

brendanlong
Copy link
Contributor

Previously the verify_mode was private, which made it impossible
to turn on certificate verification.

Previously the verify_mode was private, which made it impossible
to turn on certificate verification.
@brendanlong
Copy link
Contributor Author

I also found as a workaround, you can set ~verify:Conduit_async.Ssl.verify_certificate

@avsm
Copy link
Member

avsm commented Aug 17, 2019

Thanks!

@avsm avsm merged commit 50ad858 into mirage:master Aug 17, 2019
avsm added a commit to avsm/opam-repository that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2019
… conduit-lwt-unix (2.0.0)

CHANGES:

* lwt-unix: obtain client IP correctly when using TLS connections (mirage/ocaml-conduit#277 @victorgomes)
* lwt-unix: replace the dune/ocaml file with a `(select)` build form.
  This avoids invoking `ocamlfind` from the build, and fits in with the
  rest of dune builds much more naturally (@avsm).
* lwt-unix: force callers to give a custom callback `on_exn` in case of exceptions
  to avoid random crashes (mirage/ocaml-conduit#261 @kit-ty-kate)
* mirage: use `dns-client>=4.0.0` which is the `udns` implementation (mirage/ocaml-conduit#290 @hannesm)
* mirage: rename `mirage-conduit` to `conduit-mirage` to fit the naming structure
  of this library suite more.  All new users of Mirage should use `conduit-mirage`,
  and migrating should involve simply swapping the name in your `dune` and `opam`
  files (mirage/ocaml-conduit#302 @hannesm @avsm)
* async: expose `verify_mode` correctly in `Conduit_async` (mirage/ocaml-conduit#298 @brendanlong)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants