-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Zip][Portable] New package: thebookisclosed.ViVeTool version 0.3.2 #92418
[Zip][Portable] New package: thebookisclosed.ViVeTool version 0.3.2 #92418
Conversation
/AzurePipelines run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Hello @SpecterShell, The package manager bot determined that the metadata was not compliant. Please verify the manifest file is compliant with the package manager 1.2 manifest specification. You could also try our Windows Package Manager Manifest Creator or the YamlCreate script. For details on the specific error, see the details link below in the build pipeline. Template: msftbot/validationError/manifest/metadata |
In a VM, it installed successfully, and ran with no arguments. But both the /query and /enable arguments gave the same error:
Is there a missing dependency? |
I guess it is the |
Hi, actual ViVeTool developer here. |
I looked at: I don't believe there was any ill will intended here. There are thousands of open-source packages in the community repository here and many are maintained by parties other than the original author. The actual packages aren't being copied over. The PR is to generate a manifest so WinGet could be used to install the package. Ideally, authors would publish manifests with their releases directly, but in many cases, they aren't able due to resource constraints or knowledge. If you are interested in publishing the package yourself in the future, there are examples of how to do so using GitHub actions and we provide wingetcreate as a tool to support CI/CD scenarios: |
@denelon Thank you very much for the CI/CD pointers, I am interested in eventually pushing to WinGet but there are some quirks I'd like to iron out first. |
It was within his right to do so (at least that's what the license allows).
winget-pkgs does not allow software from unofficial sources.
I do not think you will be able to do this until the symlink dependency problem is resolved in Winget (which was the only problem in this manifest): |
winget validate --manifest <path>
?winget install --manifest <path>
?Note:
<path>
is the name of the directory containing the manifest you're submitting.Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow