-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 463
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Initial tasks support #1268
Initial tasks support #1268
Conversation
We're still interested in taking this change. Are you planning to resubmit it? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Since we're providing own task type - do we need tasksBuildCommand as external command? PS: As I've sticked to existing functionality in tasks (such as |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Sorry I haven't had a chance to take a look at your updates yet. I will do it soon. If we make a change to CI, we will probably move to Azure Pipelines like the cpptools extension. This project's CI is wrapped up in a rather involved Powershell script, so we haven't come up with a cost for migrating that to another system yet. |
UPD: misunderstanding removed There's another part I've forgot about: |
Ready to go (w/o test) |
Can someone please take a look at this? |
This change addresses items #1264, #1234
In cases with file build command context, empty ws uri is possible. Additional check added.