Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No way to see who’s an IRC chanop on Matrix #385

Closed
afranke opened this issue Mar 9, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

No way to see who’s an IRC chanop on Matrix #385

afranke opened this issue Mar 9, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@afranke
Copy link

afranke commented Mar 9, 2017

With ops bridging we have users as Moderators when their ghost is given op. There is currently no way to see which IRC users (that are not ghosts of Matrix users) are ops. Granted, giving them Moderator on Matrix doesn’t make sense, but there should still be an indicator.

@kegsay kegsay changed the title No way to see who’s op on IRC No way to see who’s an IRC chanop on Matrix May 31, 2017
kegsay added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 26, 2017
- This only works if `modePowerMap` has values >0 set for `v`, `o`, etc.
- This currently doesn't work for IRC users, as the virtual matrix user does
  not have power in the room because we do not bridge power level for those
  users. See #385.

Other than that, it seems to be working as intended.
@kegsay
Copy link
Member

kegsay commented Jun 26, 2017

This is more than just informational now, it's actually needed for #453 to work.

@Mikaela
Copy link
Contributor

Mikaela commented Jun 26, 2017

Do I understand correctly that this issue now also requires mapping mode +v which allows speaking in moderated rooms?

@kegsay
Copy link
Member

kegsay commented Jun 26, 2017

Yeah it'll need to be added to the modePowerMap in the config file in order for #453 to actually work correctly.

kegsay added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 28, 2017
And is required to fix #453, which is now working.
@kegsay
Copy link
Member

kegsay commented Jun 28, 2017

#465

@kegsay kegsay closed this as completed Jun 28, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants