-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Kernel] void function 'smi_encoder_dpms' should not return a value #13
Comments
heiher
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 16, 2018
This code assumes that any client using exchange_id is using NFSv4.1, but with the introduction of 4.2 that will no longer true. This main effect of this is that client callbacks will use the same minorversion as that used on the exchange_id. Note that clients are forbidden from mixing 4.1 and 4.2 compounds. (See rfc 5661, section 2.7, #13: "A client MUST NOT attempt to use a stateid, filehandle, or similar returned object from the COMPOUND procedure with minor version X for another COMPOUND procedure with minor version Y, where X != Y.") However, we do not currently attempt to enforce this except in the case of mixing zero minor version with non-zero minor versions. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <[email protected]>
heiher
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 21, 2018
sykzaller triggered several panics similar to the below: [...] [ 248.851531] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.857656] Read of size 985 at addr ffff8808017ffff2 by task a.out/1425 [...] [ 248.865902] CPU: 1 PID: 1425 Comm: a.out Not tainted 4.18.0-rc4+ #13 [ 248.865903] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5039MS-H12TRF/X11SSE-F, BIOS 2.1a 03/08/2018 [ 248.865905] Call Trace: [ 248.865910] dump_stack+0xd6/0x185 [ 248.865911] ? show_regs_print_info+0xb/0xb [ 248.865913] ? printk+0x9c/0xc3 [ 248.865915] ? kmsg_dump_rewind_nolock+0xe4/0xe4 [ 248.865919] print_address_description+0x6f/0x270 [ 248.865920] kasan_report+0x25b/0x380 [ 248.865922] ? _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.865924] check_memory_region+0x137/0x190 [ 248.865925] kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 [ 248.865927] _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.865930] bpf_test_finish.isra.8+0x4f/0xc0 [ 248.865932] bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x6a0/0xba0 [...] After scrubbing the BPF prog a bit from the noise, turns out it called bpf_skb_change_head() for the lwt_xmit prog with headroom of 2. Nothing wrong in that, however, this was run with repeat >> 0 in bpf_prog_test_run_skb() and the same skb thus keeps changing until the pskb_expand_head() called from skb_cow() keeps bailing out in atomic alloc context with -ENOMEM. So upon return we'll basically have 0 headroom left yet blindly do the __skb_push() of 14 bytes and keep copying data from there in bpf_test_finish() out of bounds. Fix to check if we have enough headroom and if pskb_expand_head() fails, bail out with error. Another bug independent of this fix (but related in triggering above) is that BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN should be reworked to reset the skb/xdp buffer to it's original state from input as otherwise repeating the same test in a loop won't work for benchmarking when underlying input buffer is getting changed by the prog each time and reused for the next run leading to unexpected results. Fixes: 1cf1cae ("bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command") Reported-by: [email protected] Reported-by: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
heiher
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 25, 2018
This code assumes that any client using exchange_id is using NFSv4.1, but with the introduction of 4.2 that will no longer true. This main effect of this is that client callbacks will use the same minorversion as that used on the exchange_id. Note that clients are forbidden from mixing 4.1 and 4.2 compounds. (See rfc 5661, section 2.7, #13: "A client MUST NOT attempt to use a stateid, filehandle, or similar returned object from the COMPOUND procedure with minor version X for another COMPOUND procedure with minor version Y, where X != Y.") However, we do not currently attempt to enforce this except in the case of mixing zero minor version with non-zero minor versions. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <[email protected]>
heiher
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 25, 2018
Crash dump shows following instructions crash> bt PID: 0 TASK: ffffffffbe412480 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "swapper/0" #0 [ffff891ee0003868] machine_kexec at ffffffffbd063ef1 #1 [ffff891ee00038c8] __crash_kexec at ffffffffbd12b6f2 #2 [ffff891ee0003998] crash_kexec at ffffffffbd12c84c #3 [ffff891ee00039b8] oops_end at ffffffffbd030f0a #4 [ffff891ee00039e0] no_context at ffffffffbd074643 #5 [ffff891ee0003a40] __bad_area_nosemaphore at ffffffffbd07496e #6 [ffff891ee0003a90] bad_area_nosemaphore at ffffffffbd074a64 #7 [ffff891ee0003aa0] __do_page_fault at ffffffffbd074b0a #8 [ffff891ee0003b18] do_page_fault at ffffffffbd074fc8 #9 [ffff891ee0003b50] page_fault at ffffffffbda01925 [exception RIP: qlt_schedule_sess_for_deletion+15] RIP: ffffffffc02e526f RSP: ffff891ee0003c08 RFLAGS: 00010046 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffffffc0307847 RDX: 00000000000020e6 RSI: ffff891edbc377c8 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffff891ee0003c18 R8: ffffffffc02f0b20 R9: 0000000000000250 R10: 0000000000000258 R11: 000000000000b780 R12: ffff891ed9b43000 R13: 00000000000000f0 R14: 0000000000000006 R15: ffff891edbc377c8 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 #10 [ffff891ee0003c20] qla2x00_fcport_event_handler at ffffffffc02853d3 [qla2xxx] #11 [ffff891ee0003cf0] __dta_qla24xx_async_gnl_sp_done_333 at ffffffffc0285a1d [qla2xxx] #12 [ffff891ee0003de8] qla24xx_process_response_queue at ffffffffc02a2eb5 [qla2xxx] #13 [ffff891ee0003e88] qla24xx_msix_rsp_q at ffffffffc02a5403 [qla2xxx] #14 [ffff891ee0003ec0] __handle_irq_event_percpu at ffffffffbd0f4c59 #15 [ffff891ee0003f10] handle_irq_event_percpu at ffffffffbd0f4e02 #16 [ffff891ee0003f40] handle_irq_event at ffffffffbd0f4e90 #17 [ffff891ee0003f68] handle_edge_irq at ffffffffbd0f8984 #18 [ffff891ee0003f88] handle_irq at ffffffffbd0305d5 #19 [ffff891ee0003fb8] do_IRQ at ffffffffbda02a18 --- <IRQ stack> --- #20 [ffffffffbe403d30] ret_from_intr at ffffffffbda0094e [exception RIP: unknown or invalid address] RIP: 000000000000001f RSP: 0000000000000000 RFLAGS: fff3b8c2091ebb3f RAX: ffffbba5a0000200 RBX: 0000be8cdfa8f9fa RCX: 0000000000000018 RDX: 0000000000000101 RSI: 000000000000015d RDI: 0000000000000193 RBP: 0000000000000083 R8: ffffffffbe403e38 R9: 0000000000000002 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffffffbe56b820 R12: ffff891ee001cf00 R13: ffffffffbd11c0a4 R14: ffffffffbe403d60 R15: 0000000000000001 ORIG_RAX: ffff891ee0022ac0 CS: 0000 SS: ffffffffffffffb9 bt: WARNING: possibly bogus exception frame #21 [ffffffffbe403dd8] cpuidle_enter_state at ffffffffbd67c6fd #22 [ffffffffbe403e40] cpuidle_enter at ffffffffbd67c907 #23 [ffffffffbe403e50] call_cpuidle at ffffffffbd0d98f3 #24 [ffffffffbe403e60] do_idle at ffffffffbd0d9b42 #25 [ffffffffbe403e98] cpu_startup_entry at ffffffffbd0d9da3 #26 [ffffffffbe403ec0] rest_init at ffffffffbd81d4aa #27 [ffffffffbe403ed0] start_kernel at ffffffffbe67d2ca #28 [ffffffffbe403f28] x86_64_start_reservations at ffffffffbe67c675 #29 [ffffffffbe403f38] x86_64_start_kernel at ffffffffbe67c6eb #30 [ffffffffbe403f50] secondary_startup_64 at ffffffffbd0000d5 Fixes: 040036b ("scsi: qla2xxx: Delay loop id allocation at login") Cc: <[email protected]> # v4.17+ Signed-off-by: Chuck Anderson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Himanshu Madhani <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]>
heiher
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 18, 2018
This code assumes that any client using exchange_id is using NFSv4.1, but with the introduction of 4.2 that will no longer true. This main effect of this is that client callbacks will use the same minorversion as that used on the exchange_id. Note that clients are forbidden from mixing 4.1 and 4.2 compounds. (See rfc 5661, section 2.7, #13: "A client MUST NOT attempt to use a stateid, filehandle, or similar returned object from the COMPOUND procedure with minor version X for another COMPOUND procedure with minor version Y, where X != Y.") However, we do not currently attempt to enforce this except in the case of mixing zero minor version with non-zero minor versions. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi Loonger,
Regards,
Leslie Zhai
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: