Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

community: add support for Moonshot llm and chat model #17100

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 29, 2024
Merged

community: add support for Moonshot llm and chat model #17100

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 29, 2024

Conversation

jialeicui
Copy link
Contributor

  • Description: Add support for Moonshot LLM and chat model

Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 6, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
langchain ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Mar 29, 2024 8:54am

@dosubot dosubot bot added size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. Ɑ: models Related to LLMs or chat model modules 🤖:enhancement A large net-new component, integration, or chain. Use sparingly. The largest features labels Feb 6, 2024
@Casper-Mars
Copy link

When can this PR be merged?

@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm PR looks good. Use to confirm that a PR is ready for merging. label Mar 29, 2024
@baskaryan baskaryan enabled auto-merge (squash) March 29, 2024 08:41
@baskaryan baskaryan merged commit f7c903e into langchain-ai:master Mar 29, 2024
61 checks passed
gkorland pushed a commit to FalkorDB/langchain that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2024
twang2218 added a commit to twang2218/langchain that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2024
In PR langchain-ai#17100, the implementation for Moonshot was added, which defined two classes:

- `MoonshotChat(MoonshotCommon, ChatOpenAI)` in `langchain_community.chat_models.moonshot`;
  - Here, `validate_environment()` assigns **client** as `openai.OpenAI().chat.completions`
    - Note that **client** here is actually a member variable defined in `ChatOpenAI`;
- `MoonshotCommon` in `langchain_community.llms.moonshot`;
  - And here, `validate_environment()` assigns **_client** as `_MoonshotClient`;
    - Note that this is the underscored **_client**, which is defined within `MoonshotCommon` itself;

At this time, there was no conflict between the two, one being `client` and the other `_client`.

However, in PR langchain-ai#25878 which fixed langchain-ai#24390, `_client` in `MoonshotCommon` was changed to `client`. Since then, a conflict in the definition of `client` has arisen between `MoonshotCommon` and `MoonshotChat`, which caused `pydantic` validation error.

To fix this issue, the type of `client` in `MoonshotCommon` should be changed to `Any`.

Signed-off-by: Tao Wang <[email protected]>
ccurme pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2024
- **Description:** Change `MoonshotCommon.client` type from
`_MoonshotClient` to `Any`.
- **Issue:** Fix the issue #27058
- **Dependencies:** No
- **Twitter handle:** TaoWang2218

In PR #17100, the implementation for Moonshot was added, which defined
two classes:

- `MoonshotChat(MoonshotCommon, ChatOpenAI)` in
`langchain_community.chat_models.moonshot`;
- Here, `validate_environment()` assigns **client** as
`openai.OpenAI().chat.completions`
- Note that **client** here is actually a member variable defined in
`ChatOpenAI`;
- `MoonshotCommon` in `langchain_community.llms.moonshot`;
- And here, `validate_environment()` assigns **_client** as
`_MoonshotClient`;
- Note that this is the underscored **_client**, which is defined within
`MoonshotCommon` itself;

At this time, there was no conflict between the two, one being `client`
and the other `_client`.

However, in PR #25878 which fixed #24390, `_client` in `MoonshotCommon`
was changed to `client`. Since then, a conflict in the definition of
`client` has arisen between `MoonshotCommon` and `MoonshotChat`, which
caused `pydantic` validation error.

To fix this issue, the type of `client` in `MoonshotCommon` should be
changed to `Any`.

Signed-off-by: Tao Wang <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🤖:enhancement A large net-new component, integration, or chain. Use sparingly. The largest features lgtm PR looks good. Use to confirm that a PR is ready for merging. Ɑ: models Related to LLMs or chat model modules size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants