Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Update Kubevirt CR used in CI #516

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 10, 2023

Conversation

akrejcir
Copy link
Collaborator

@akrejcir akrejcir commented Mar 9, 2023

What this PR does / why we need it:
Enable KubevirtSeccompProfile feature gate, so VM can be started on OCP 4.13.

Release note:

None

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. label Mar 9, 2023
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot requested review from 0xFelix and lyarwood March 9, 2023 11:09
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. label Mar 9, 2023
@akrejcir
Copy link
Collaborator Author

akrejcir commented Mar 9, 2023

/cc @0xFelix

Enable "KubevirtSeccompProfile" feature gate,
so VM can be started on OCP 4.13.

Signed-off-by: Andrej Krejcir <[email protected]>
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Mar 9, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

Copy link
Member

@lyarwood lyarwood left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Quick nit about the need for the LM feature gate but this LGTM in the short term.

Longer term I'd prefer it if we used the example CR provided with the release and patched in anything missing like this but that's something for a follow up so we can unblock 4.13 CI.

kind: KubeVirt
metadata:
name: kubevirt
namespace: kubevirt
spec:
certificateRotateStrategy: {}
configuration:
selinuxLauncherType: "virt_launcher.process"
developerConfiguration:
featureGates:
- DataVolumes
- CPUManager
- LiveMigration
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit - Do we really need LiveMigration?

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 9, 2023
Copy link
Member

@0xFelix 0xFelix left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

Let's get this in to unblock the CI, but please implement a follow up with Lee's suggestion. I opened an issue for it: #517

Thanks!

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: 0xFelix

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 10, 2023
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot merged commit 7061db9 into kubevirt:master Mar 10, 2023
@akrejcir akrejcir deleted the fix-ci-kubevirt branch March 10, 2023 09:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/S
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants