-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 270
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ceph WFFC lane set up #2644
Ceph WFFC lane set up #2644
Conversation
/cc @awels sonar cloud complains about cluster-up but I am pretty sure we have excluded it before |
@akalenyu: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: am, pretty, excluded, before, sonar, sure, it, but, I, we, have, complains. Note that only kubevirt members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
looks good to me, just one random question.
# | ||
|
||
set -ex | ||
export TARGET=k8s-1.24 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Any reason not to use 1.25?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not really, just sticking close to the current ceph script
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: awels The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
cluster-sync/k8s-1.23/provider.sh
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
1.23 is not supported anymore
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
removed together with 1.22
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm in this aspect, thanks
Signed-off-by: Alex Kalenyuk <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Kalenyuk <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Kalenyuk <[email protected]>
e077e7a
to
748607a
Compare
/cc @awels Sonar complaining again :( |
Fixed it again, even though we told it to exclude /cluster-up it is still checking. |
Also lost your lgtm, basically didn't change anything other than removing some outdated sync providers |
/lgtm |
* Bump kubevirtci for wffc ceph storage class Signed-off-by: Alex Kalenyuk <[email protected]> * Add infrastructure needed for ceph wffc lane Signed-off-by: Alex Kalenyuk <[email protected]> * Remove unused cluster sync providers Signed-off-by: Alex Kalenyuk <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: Alex Kalenyuk <[email protected]>
What this PR does / why we need it:
We aim to support WFFC storage classes seamlessly so a periodic run from time to time may
increase our confidence in such setup
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
kubevirtci now gives us both an Immediate & WFFC storage class kubevirt/kubevirtci#967
Release note: