-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
KEP-3751: Update for milestone 1.31 #4698
Conversation
AndrewSirenko
commented
Jun 5, 2024
- One-line PR description: Update milestone 1.31 and fill out PRR
- Issue link: Kubernetes VolumeAttributesClass ModifyVolume #3751
- Other comments: Few items to be updated by enhancement freeze.
Welcome @AndrewSirenko! |
Hi @AndrewSirenko. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/ok-to-test |
Please update this PRR yaml file for beta: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/prod-readiness/sig-storage/3751.yaml /assign @johnbelamaric |
/assign @msau42 |
045e2e7
to
30921d9
Compare
7926df3
to
17401d6
Compare
@@ -663,13 +674,13 @@ We expect no non-infra related flakes in the last month as a GA graduation crite | |||
|
|||
#### Beta | |||
|
|||
- Beta in 1.30: Since this feature is an extension of the external-resizer/external-provisioner usage flow, we are going to move this to beta with enhanced e2e and test coverage. Test cases are covered in sessions above: ``e2e tests``, ``Integration tests`` etc. | |||
- Beta in 1.31: Since this feature is an extension of the external-resizer/external-provisioner usage flow, we are going to move this to beta with enhanced e2e and test coverage. Test cases are covered in sessions above: ``e2e tests``, ``Integration tests`` etc. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need two beta stages to solve the beta API not available by default? If so, we may need to mention it in the KEP.
cc @msau42
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we will have 2 beta stages, I will change wording to the following.
- Beta in 1.31 – Feature gate on API Server enabled by default (Off by default in external-provisioner/external-resizer): Since this feature is an extension of the external-resizer/external-provisioner usage flow, we are going to move this to beta with enhanced e2e and test coverage. Test cases are covered in sessions above: ``e2e tests``, ``Integration tests`` etc.
- Beta stage 2 in 1.3x – Feature gate enabled API Server **and** external-provisioner/external-resizer by default.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's referring to this https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-architecture/3136-beta-apis-off-by-default
So the feature gates are on by default, but the API is off. This implies that the controllers need to handle this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changing wording back. I assume the following is fine:
- Beta in 1.31: Since this feature is an extension of the external-resizer/external-provisioner usage flow, we are going to move this to beta with enhanced e2e and test coverage. Test cases are covered in sessions above: ``e2e tests``, ``Integration tests`` etc. Controllers will handle VolumeAttributeClass feature gates being on by default, but beta API itself being disabled on clusters by default.
1c57fcb
to
8d683fd
Compare
/hold for SIG approval |
Once there is SIG approval you can unhold (my approval doesn't count for the SIG, but the tooling looks that way). |
/lgtm /hold cancel |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: AndrewSirenko, johnbelamaric, msau42 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |