Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Skip iteration loop if node creation failed #4143

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 16, 2021

Conversation

BigDarkClown
Copy link
Contributor

@BigDarkClown BigDarkClown commented Jun 15, 2021

In case of stockout or quota issue CA will watch for nodes with create errors and delete them. After deletion it will continue the loop normally. However, it will not trigger any sort of clusterstate recalculation and the deleted nodes will still be counted as upcoming and the rest of CA logic will continue expecting them to come up.

Similar logic that handles nodes that timed out will break CA loop instead. This seems like a more correct behaviour.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jun 15, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 15, 2021
@@ -346,7 +346,10 @@ func (a *StaticAutoscaler) RunOnce(currentTime time.Time) errors.AutoscalerError
return nil
}

a.deleteCreatedNodesWithErrors()
if a.deleteCreatedNodesWithErrors() {
klog.V(0).Infof("Creation of some nodes failed, deleting them and skipping iteration")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: I think the wording is a bit misleading - it suggests CA tried to create nodes this loop and failed. Maybe "Removed some nodes that failed to create, skipping iteration"?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done, changed to "Some nodes that failed to create were removed, skipping iteration" for consistency with the similar log above.

@MaciekPytel
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve
/hold
Hold for a minor nit. Feel free to remove hold and merge.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 16, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 16, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: BigDarkClown, MaciekPytel

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 16, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 16, 2021
@BigDarkClown
Copy link
Contributor Author

/unhold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 16, 2021
@MaciekPytel
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 16, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 7d7df8c into kubernetes:master Jun 16, 2021
evansheng pushed a commit to airbnb/autoscaler that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2022
Skip iteration loop if node creation failed
evansheng pushed a commit to airbnb/autoscaler that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2022
Skip iteration loop if node creation failed
evansheng pushed a commit to airbnb/autoscaler that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2022
Skip iteration loop if node creation failed
evansheng pushed a commit to airbnb/autoscaler that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2022
Skip iteration loop if node creation failed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants