Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cloudprovider hetzner #3838

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 11, 2021

Conversation

LKaemmerling
Copy link
Contributor

Resubmit of #3640

Hello everyone,

I'm from the Hetzner Cloud Team and i'm happy to resubmit PR #3640 with the work of @Fgruntjes.
My collegues and i will maintain this implementation in the future. We see a high
demand from our customers for an integration into the Kubernetes Autoscaler.

So we want to thank @Fgruntjes again for his work on the initial implementation.

We will continue to improve the implementation and also support it.

cc @fhofherr

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/invalid-commit-message Indicates that a PR should not merge because it has an invalid commit message. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jan 21, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @LKaemmerling!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/autoscaler 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/autoscaler has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 21, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/invalid-owners-file Indicates that a PR should not merge because it has an invalid OWNERS file in it. label Jan 21, 2021
@LKaemmerling LKaemmerling force-pushed the cloudprovider-hetzner branch from 403b0cc to faabc9d Compare January 22, 2021 08:31
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.


  • If you've already signed a CLA, it's possible we don't have your GitHub username or you're using a different email address. Check your existing CLA data and verify that your email is set on your git commits.
  • If you signed the CLA as a corporation, please sign in with your organization's credentials at https://identity.linuxfoundation.org/projects/cncf to be authorized.
  • If you have done the above and are still having issues with the CLA being reported as unsigned, please log a ticket with the Linux Foundation Helpdesk: https://support.linuxfoundation.org/
  • Should you encounter any issues with the Linux Foundation Helpdesk, send a message to the backup e-mail support address at: [email protected]

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jan 22, 2021
@LKaemmerling LKaemmerling force-pushed the cloudprovider-hetzner branch from b29529d to 298eee9 Compare January 22, 2021 14:33
@fhofherr
Copy link
Contributor

cla signed

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jan 23, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@LKaemmerling: PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 26, 2021
@LKaemmerling
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @team, this MR is from our side basically ready. The bot says I should assign it with:

/assign @aleksandra-malinowska

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 9, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/invalid-commit-message Indicates that a PR should not merge because it has an invalid commit message. label Feb 22, 2021
@LKaemmerling
Copy link
Contributor Author

/verify-owners

@robjuz
Copy link

robjuz commented Mar 9, 2021

Any update on this? I would love to use it I’m production.

@mwielgus
Copy link
Contributor

Please remove the people outside of K8S org from the owners file and squash the commits to 1-2. Then we should be good to go.

@mwielgus
Copy link
Contributor

And fix the boilerplate so that the verify scripts pass.

@LKaemmerling LKaemmerling force-pushed the cloudprovider-hetzner branch from c426871 to e565b7f Compare March 11, 2021 14:39
@LKaemmerling LKaemmerling force-pushed the cloudprovider-hetzner branch from e565b7f to 4ded82b Compare March 11, 2021 14:40
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/invalid-owners-file Indicates that a PR should not merge because it has an invalid OWNERS file in it. label Mar 11, 2021
@LKaemmerling
Copy link
Contributor Author

LKaemmerling commented Mar 11, 2021

@mwielgus should be ready (now 2 commits, removed owner file and the tests should work now)

@LKaemmerling LKaemmerling force-pushed the cloudprovider-hetzner branch from 4ded82b to 4a9ee09 Compare March 11, 2021 14:44
Signed-off-by: Lukas Kämmerling <[email protected]>
@LKaemmerling LKaemmerling force-pushed the cloudprovider-hetzner branch from 4a9ee09 to c8b1501 Compare March 11, 2021 14:56
Copy link
Contributor

@mwielgus mwielgus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 11, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: LKaemmerling, mwielgus

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 11, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 22521cc into kubernetes:master Mar 11, 2021
@blindpirate
Copy link

Hi @LKaemmerling Thanks for the contribution, we're a Hetzner cloud user and we've run into some crashes with hetzner autoscaler, I wonder if there's repo in hetzner organization to report this issue?

@jawabuu
Copy link

jawabuu commented Aug 10, 2021

@LKaemmerling @mwielgus
I'm testing out this autoscaler and it seems no kubernetes events are emitted nor nodes annotated on scaledown.
Is this expected?

@jawabuu
Copy link

jawabuu commented Aug 10, 2021

From docs

Whenever Cluster Autoscaler adds or removes nodes it will create events describing this action. It will also create events for some serious errors. Below is the non-exhaustive list of events emitted by CA (new events may be added in future):
 on kube-system/cluster-autoscaler-status config map:
ScaledUpGroup - CA increased the size of node group, gives both old and new group size.
ScaleDownEmpty - CA removed a node with no pods running on it (except system pods found on all nodes).
ScaleDown - CA decided to remove a node with some pods running on it. Event includes names of all pods that will be rescheduled to drain the node.
on nodes:
ScaleDown - CA is scaling down the node. Multiple ScaleDown events may be recorded on the node, describing status of scale-down operation.
ScaleDownFailed - CA tried to remove the node, but failed. The event includes error message.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants