Update cert-manager to v1.7.2 #8648
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
k8s-ci-robot
added
kind/feature
|
The change seems good for me. /approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: oomichi, rtsp The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
approved
rtsp
force-pushed
the
develop/cert-manager-v1.7.2
branch
from
04d32d1 to
7395a11
Compare
|
/lgtm |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
lgtm
|
Thank you @rtsp 👍 |
Quehenr
pushed a commit
to Quehenr/unstable-laboratory-infrastructure-kubespray
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 4, 2022
* master: (21 commits) Fix quotation of nerdctl_extra_flags (kubernetes-sigs#8668) fix: uninstall contailer engine if service is running (kubernetes-sigs#8662) fix disk controller type in Vagrantfile (kubernetes-sigs#8656) Add ETCD_EXPERIMENTAL_INITIAL_CORRUPT_CHECK flag to etcd config (kubernetes-sigs#8664) Update vagrant.md (kubernetes-sigs#8663) Add missing 2.10 ansible test (kubernetes-sigs#8665) [ansible] make ansible 5.x the new default version (kubernetes-sigs#8660) Run 0100-dhclient-hooks if dhcpclient is enabled (kubernetes-sigs#8658) terrform/openstack: Fix templating of ansible_ssh_common_args in no_floating.yml if used as TF module (kubernetes-sigs#8646) [ansible] add support for ansible 5 (ansible-core 2.12) (kubernetes-sigs#8512) [etcd] add 0 hash for arm v3.5.2 to prevent deployment failures Update cert-manager to v1.7.2 (kubernetes-sigs#8648) fix vagrant parameter (kubernetes-sigs#8650) Remove centos7 molecule while opensuse mirror is flaky Remove k8s module for ns creation Update kubernetes image to 2.18.1 Vagrantfile: add var to set ansible verbosity level (kubernetes-sigs#8639) Have ingress_controller and external_provisioner in upgrade-cluster.yml (kubernetes-sigs#8640) [sysctl] set fs.may_detach_mounts=1 even when CRIs don't set it themselves (kubernetes-sigs#8635) Fixed cluster roles for openstack cloud controller (kubernetes-sigs#8638) ...
sakuraiyuta
pushed a commit
to sakuraiyuta/kubespray
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 16, 2022
Closed
LuckySB
pushed a commit
to southbridgeio/kubespray
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 29, 2023
LuckySB
pushed a commit
to southbridgeio/kubespray
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 23, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
Update cert-manager to v1.7.2
I've checked that https://github.com/cert-manager/cert-manager/releases/download/v1.7.0/cert-manager.yaml and https://github.com/cert-manager/cert-manager/releases/download/v1.7.2/cert-manager.yaml are compatible to each other and require only those change in my PR.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: