Using ctr pull instead of nerdctl

[yankay]

What type of PR is this?

/kind failing-test

What this PR does / why we need it:

Using ctr pull instead of nerdctl to workaround the #10670 .

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Workaround #10670

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

Using ctr pull instead of nerdctl to workaround https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubespray/issues/10670.

[VannTen]

Looks like it works. Log output is pretty messy though, but I guess ctr has some flag to be a tad more quiet ^.

[ant31]

/ok-to-test

[yankay]

Looks like it works. Log output is pretty messy though, but I guess ctr has some flag to be a tad more quiet ^.

Releate to containerd/containerd#9467

[floryut]

@yankay Shouldn't this be changed only for the CI not for the whole codebase ?

[VannTen]

Well I don't think so. The failure would also happens outisde of CI (or am I mistaken ?) so until nerdctl is fixed... We're a bit stuck with finding a workaround.

[floryut]

Well I don't think so. The failure would also happens outisde of CI (or am I mistaken ?) so until nerdctl is fixed... We're a bit stuck with finding a workaround.

ok fine by me then
/lgtm

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: floryut, yankay

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [floryut,yankay]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment