Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 Add v1alpha3 to scheme in order to enable conversion webhook #988

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

🐛 Add v1alpha3 to scheme in order to enable conversion webhook #988

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Lirt
Copy link

@Lirt Lirt commented Sep 7, 2021

Signed-off-by: Ondrej Vasko [email protected]

What this PR does / why we need it:

Conversion webhook is not initialized. This PR registersv1alpha3 scheme in order to initialize conversion webhook. More info in issue.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes *

Fixes #987

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 7, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.


  • If you've already signed a CLA, it's possible we don't have your GitHub username or you're using a different email address. Check your existing CLA data and verify that your email is set on your git commits.
  • If you signed the CLA as a corporation, please sign in with your organization's credentials at https://identity.linuxfoundation.org/projects/cncf to be authorized.
  • If you have done the above and are still having issues with the CLA being reported as unsigned, please log a ticket with the Linux Foundation Helpdesk: https://support.linuxfoundation.org/
  • Should you encounter any issues with the Linux Foundation Helpdesk, send a message to the backup e-mail support address at: [email protected]

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Sep 7, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @Lirt!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-openstack 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-openstack has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @Lirt. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 7, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Lirt
To complete the pull request process, please assign neolit123 after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @neolit123 in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@Lirt
Copy link
Author

Lirt commented Sep 7, 2021

/assign @neolit123

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Sep 7, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@Lirt: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/ok-to-test

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@mdbooth
Copy link
Contributor

mdbooth commented Sep 7, 2021

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Sep 7, 2021
@tobiasgiese
Copy link
Member

Seems to be a duplicate of #985

@Lirt
Copy link
Author

Lirt commented Sep 7, 2021

I didn't notice that PR in the meantime, it was opened 1 day before mine.

Difference in code change is that the second PR includes also old CAPI schemas, which are IMO not needed here as CAPOv4 should only work with already converted ones.

@Lirt
Copy link
Author

Lirt commented Sep 7, 2021

Test failed because of diff in zz_generated.deepcopy.go. I ran go mod tidy and make generate before I pushed so that I am sure everything is synced and there were 2 changes that are included in the commit. I don't know why there is a diff.

@neolit123
Copy link
Member

leaving approval to the active maintainers from the OWNERS files.

@neolit123 neolit123 removed their assignment Sep 7, 2021
@chrischdi
Copy link
Member

/retest

I agree with @Lirt that adding the old clusterv1 is not needed.

@tobiasgiese
Copy link
Member

Test failed because of diff in zz_generated.deepcopy.go. I ran go mod tidy and make generate before I pushed so that I am sure everything is synced and there were 2 changes that are included in the commit. I don't know why there is a diff.

@Lirt you have to run make verify to also get the boilerplate changes

@Lirt
Copy link
Author

Lirt commented Sep 8, 2021

As the changes are the same as in PR #985 I leave it to maintainers to merge any of those.

We are already testing this change in production and so far it looks OK. Thank you for help during PR, it was good experience for me anyway.

@chrischdi
Copy link
Member

As the changes are the same as in PR #985 I leave it to maintainers to merge any of those.

We are already testing this change in production and so far it looks OK. Thank you for help during PR, it was good experience for me anyway.

Thanks a lot for your verification and help 👍

@chrischdi
Copy link
Member

So let's close this in favor of #985 :-)

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@chrischdi: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

So let's close this in favor of #985 :-)

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Conversion webhook is not initialized
6 participants