Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sidecar controller update, fix potential snapshot leaking #210

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2019

Conversation

yuxiangqian
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:
clean up sidecar logic, fix potential snapshot leaking issue, added more test cases

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #209

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
NONE

None

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Dec 14, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 14, 2019
@yuxiangqian
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @xing-yang

@yuxiangqian
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @jingxu97

@xing-yang
Copy link
Collaborator

Have you tested this? Is there a visible delay in content deletion?

@yuxiangqian
Copy link
Contributor Author

Have you tested this? Is there a visible delay in content deletion?

It's kinda of hard to reproduce the leak issue. deletion via CSI happens really quick in real drivers like PD. I have, though, added unit testing to mimic driver error, and saw the finalizer is still there not removed.

@xing-yang
Copy link
Collaborator

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 18, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: xing-yang, yuxiangqian

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [xing-yang,yuxiangqian]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit ed82822 into kubernetes-csi:master Dec 18, 2019
andyzhangx added a commit to andyzhangx/external-snapshotter that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2023
b54c1ba Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#246 from xing-yang/go_1.21
5436c81 Change go version to 1.21.5
267b40e Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#244 from carlory/sig-storage
b42e5a2 nominate self (carlory) as kubernetes-csi reviewer
a17f536 Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#210 from sunnylovestiramisu/sidecar
011033d Use set -x instead of die
5deaf66 Add wrapper script for sidecar release

git-subtree-dir: release-tools
git-subtree-split: b54c1ba
andyzhangx pushed a commit to andyzhangx/external-snapshotter that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Potential leaking of snapshot on underlying storage system when deletion fails
3 participants