Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

split cloud_auth into gcp and azure #702

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 30, 2021

Conversation

mansona
Copy link
Contributor

@mansona mansona commented Jul 21, 2021

This PR is to track work on #700

This is probably going to be very WIP for a long time because I don't really know what I'm doing with this repo 😂 Please be as harsh as possible and tell me what I need to change to move forward 🙇

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 21, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @mansona!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-client/javascript 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-client/javascript has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.


  • If you've already signed a CLA, it's possible we don't have your GitHub username or you're using a different email address. Check your existing CLA data and verify that your email is set on your git commits.
  • If you signed the CLA as a corporation, please sign in with your organization's credentials at https://identity.linuxfoundation.org/projects/cncf to be authorized.
  • If you have done the above and are still having issues with the CLA being reported as unsigned, please log a ticket with the Linux Foundation Helpdesk: https://support.linuxfoundation.org/
  • Should you encounter any issues with the Linux Foundation Helpdesk, send a message to the backup e-mail support address at: [email protected]

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 21, 2021
@mansona
Copy link
Contributor Author

mansona commented Jul 21, 2021

I've signed the CLA

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jul 21, 2021
@brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor

brendandburns commented Jul 21, 2021

@mansona this looks totally reasonable. Please use the tests from config_test.ts instead of the ones from oidc as mentioned in the issue you filled and I think that this is good to merge.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 27, 2021
@mansona
Copy link
Contributor Author

mansona commented Jul 27, 2021

@brendanburns I pulled the config tests that you mentioned but I only applied them to the azure file since they were all azure. Do you want me to duplicate them for gcp too?

@mansona mansona marked this pull request as ready for review July 27, 2021 20:51
@brendanburns
Copy link
Contributor

brendanburns commented Jul 27, 2021 via email

@mansona mansona changed the title WIP: split cloud_auth into gcp and azure split cloud_auth into gcp and azure Jul 29, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 29, 2021
@mansona
Copy link
Contributor Author

mansona commented Jul 29, 2021

I have added the tests for GCP now too 👍

Would you mind approving the workflows on this? I had a strange test failure on my local machine that I can't explain and I want to know if it's something in my environment or if it's something that I've broken 🙈

@brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve

@brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like ci/cd is failing....

@mansona
Copy link
Contributor Author

mansona commented Jul 29, 2021

that's actually perfect! it's failing with the same error that I got locally so I know it's not my environment 🎉

I'll take a look and get this fixed in a bit 👍

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jul 29, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 29, 2021
@mansona
Copy link
Contributor Author

mansona commented Jul 29, 2021

I found the issue 🎉 there was a test that depended on the exact order and length of the authenticators in config instead of searching for the right one.

I fixed that: https://github.com/kubernetes-client/javascript/pull/702/files#diff-f7d16ccc3d41b45b1511b3e65724c67009d49174a7a290c4034487e89e13141dL1001-R752

@brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve

Thanks!

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 30, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: brendandburns, mansona

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 1adb9a7 into kubernetes-client:master Jul 30, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants