Support the monkeyboard DAB+ receiver #17
Comments
koalo
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 19, 2013
…optimizations
Recent GCC versions (e.g. GCC-4.7.2) perform optimizations based on
assumptions about the implementation of memset and similar functions.
The current ARM optimized memset code does not return the value of
its first argument, as is usually expected from standard implementations.
For instance in the following function:
void debug_mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, struct mutex_waiter *waiter)
{
memset(waiter, MUTEX_DEBUG_INIT, sizeof(*waiter));
waiter->magic = waiter;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&waiter->list);
}
compiled as:
800554d0 <debug_mutex_lock_common>:
800554d0: e92d4008 push {r3, lr}
800554d4: e1a00001 mov r0, r1
800554d8: e3a02010 mov r2, #16 ; 0x10
800554dc: e3a01011 mov r1, #17 ; 0x11
800554e0: eb04426e bl 80165ea0 <memset>
800554e4: e1a03000 mov r3, r0
800554e8: e583000c str r0, [r3, #12]
800554ec: e5830000 str r0, [r3]
800554f0: e5830004 str r0, [r3, #4]
800554f4: e8bd8008 pop {r3, pc}
GCC assumes memset returns the value of pointer 'waiter' in register r0; causing
register/memory corruptions.
This patch fixes the return value of the assembly version of memset.
It adds a 'mov' instruction and merges an additional load+store into
existing load/store instructions.
For ease of review, here is a breakdown of the patch into 4 simple steps:
Step 1
======
Perform the following substitutions:
ip -> r8, then
r0 -> ip,
and insert 'mov ip, r0' as the first statement of the function.
At this point, we have a memset() implementation returning the proper result,
but corrupting r8 on some paths (the ones that were using ip).
Step 2
======
Make sure r8 is saved and restored when (! CALGN(1)+0) == 1:
save r8:
- str lr, [sp, #-4]!
+ stmfd sp!, {r8, lr}
and restore r8 on both exit paths:
- ldmeqfd sp!, {pc} @ Now <64 bytes to go.
+ ldmeqfd sp!, {r8, pc} @ Now <64 bytes to go.
(...)
tst r2, #16
stmneia ip!, {r1, r3, r8, lr}
- ldr lr, [sp], #4
+ ldmfd sp!, {r8, lr}
Step 3
======
Make sure r8 is saved and restored when (! CALGN(1)+0) == 0:
save r8:
- stmfd sp!, {r4-r7, lr}
+ stmfd sp!, {r4-r8, lr}
and restore r8 on both exit paths:
bgt 3b
- ldmeqfd sp!, {r4-r7, pc}
+ ldmeqfd sp!, {r4-r8, pc}
(...)
tst r2, #16
stmneia ip!, {r4-r7}
- ldmfd sp!, {r4-r7, lr}
+ ldmfd sp!, {r4-r8, lr}
Step 4
======
Rewrite register list "r4-r7, r8" as "r4-r8".
Signed-off-by: Ivan Djelic <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Pitre <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <[email protected]>
koalo
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 19, 2013
do_loopback calls lock_mount(path) and forget to unlock_mount if clone_mnt or copy_mnt fails. [ 77.661566] ================================================ [ 77.662939] [ BUG: lock held when returning to user space! ] [ 77.664104] 3.9.0-rc5+ #17 Not tainted [ 77.664982] ------------------------------------------------ [ 77.666488] mount/514 is leaving the kernel with locks still held! [ 77.668027] 2 locks held by mount/514: [ 77.668817] #0: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#7){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811cca22>] lock_mount+0x32/0xe0 [ 77.671755] #1: (&namespace_sem){+++++.}, at: [<ffffffff811cca3a>] lock_mount+0x4a/0xe0 Signed-off-by: Andrey Vagin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>
koalo
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 19, 2013
…s struct file commit e4daf1f upstream. The following call chain: ------------------------------------------------------------ nfs4_get_vfs_file - nfsd_open - dentry_open - do_dentry_open - __get_file_write_access - get_write_access - return atomic_inc_unless_negative(&inode->i_writecount) ? 0 : -ETXTBSY; ------------------------------------------------------------ can result in the following state: ------------------------------------------------------------ struct nfs4_file { ... fi_fds = {0xffff880c1fa65c80, 0xffffffffffffffe6, 0x0}, fi_access = {{ counter = 0x1 }, { counter = 0x0 }}, ... ------------------------------------------------------------ 1) First time around, in nfs4_get_vfs_file() fp->fi_fds[O_WRONLY] is NULL, hence nfsd_open() is called where we get status set to an error and fp->fi_fds[O_WRONLY] to -ETXTBSY. Thus we do not reach nfs4_file_get_access() and fi_access[O_WRONLY] is not incremented. 2) Second time around, in nfs4_get_vfs_file() fp->fi_fds[O_WRONLY] is NOT NULL (-ETXTBSY), so nfsd_open() is NOT called, but nfs4_file_get_access() IS called and fi_access[O_WRONLY] is incremented. Thus we leave a landmine in the form of the nfs4_file data structure in an incorrect state. 3) Eventually, when __nfs4_file_put_access() is called it finds fi_access[O_WRONLY] being non-zero, it decrements it and calls nfs4_file_put_fd() which tries to fput -ETXTBSY. ------------------------------------------------------------ ... [exception RIP: fput+0x9] RIP: ffffffff81177fa9 RSP: ffff88062e365c90 RFLAGS: 00010282 RAX: ffff880c2b3d99cc RBX: ffff880c2b3d9978 RCX: 0000000000000002 RDX: dead000000100101 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffffffffffe6 RBP: ffff88062e365c90 R8: ffff88041fe797d8 R9: ffff88062e365d58 R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 0000000000000007 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 #9 [ffff88062e365c98] __nfs4_file_put_access at ffffffffa0562334 [nfsd] #10 [ffff88062e365cc8] nfs4_file_put_access at ffffffffa05623ab [nfsd] #11 [ffff88062e365ce8] free_generic_stateid at ffffffffa056634d [nfsd] #12 [ffff88062e365d18] release_open_stateid at ffffffffa0566e4b [nfsd] #13 [ffff88062e365d38] nfsd4_close at ffffffffa0567401 [nfsd] #14 [ffff88062e365d88] nfsd4_proc_compound at ffffffffa0557f28 [nfsd] #15 [ffff88062e365dd8] nfsd_dispatch at ffffffffa054543e [nfsd] #16 [ffff88062e365e18] svc_process_common at ffffffffa04ba5a4 [sunrpc] #17 [ffff88062e365e98] svc_process at ffffffffa04babe0 [sunrpc] #18 [ffff88062e365eb8] nfsd at ffffffffa0545b62 [nfsd] #19 [ffff88062e365ee8] kthread at ffffffff81090886 #20 [ffff88062e365f48] kernel_thread at ffffffff8100c14a ------------------------------------------------------------ Signed-off-by: Harshula Jayasuriya <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
koalo
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 4, 2014
Several people reported the warning: "kernel BUG at kernel/timer.c:729!" and the stack trace is: #7 [ffff880214d25c10] mod_timer+501 at ffffffff8106d905 #8 [ffff880214d25c50] br_multicast_del_pg.isra.20+261 at ffffffffa0731d25 [bridge] #9 [ffff880214d25c80] br_multicast_disable_port+88 at ffffffffa0732948 [bridge] #10 [ffff880214d25cb0] br_stp_disable_port+154 at ffffffffa072bcca [bridge] #11 [ffff880214d25ce8] br_device_event+520 at ffffffffa072a4e8 [bridge] #12 [ffff880214d25d18] notifier_call_chain+76 at ffffffff8164aafc #13 [ffff880214d25d50] raw_notifier_call_chain+22 at ffffffff810858f6 #14 [ffff880214d25d60] call_netdevice_notifiers+45 at ffffffff81536aad #15 [ffff880214d25d80] dev_close_many+183 at ffffffff81536d17 #16 [ffff880214d25dc0] rollback_registered_many+168 at ffffffff81537f68 #17 [ffff880214d25de8] rollback_registered+49 at ffffffff81538101 #18 [ffff880214d25e10] unregister_netdevice_queue+72 at ffffffff815390d8 #19 [ffff880214d25e30] __tun_detach+272 at ffffffffa074c2f0 [tun] #20 [ffff880214d25e88] tun_chr_close+45 at ffffffffa074c4bd [tun] #21 [ffff880214d25ea8] __fput+225 at ffffffff8119b1f1 #22 [ffff880214d25ef0] ____fput+14 at ffffffff8119b3fe #23 [ffff880214d25f00] task_work_run+159 at ffffffff8107cf7f #24 [ffff880214d25f30] do_notify_resume+97 at ffffffff810139e1 #25 [ffff880214d25f50] int_signal+18 at ffffffff8164f292 this is due to I forgot to check if mp->timer is armed in br_multicast_del_pg(). This bug is introduced by commit 9f00b2e (bridge: only expire the mdb entry when query is received). Same for __br_mdb_del(). Tested-by: poma <[email protected]> Reported-by: LiYonghua <[email protected]> Reported-by: Robert Hancock <[email protected]> Cc: Herbert Xu <[email protected]> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]> Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
koalo
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 4, 2014
…s struct file
The following call chain:
------------------------------------------------------------
nfs4_get_vfs_file
- nfsd_open
- dentry_open
- do_dentry_open
- __get_file_write_access
- get_write_access
- return atomic_inc_unless_negative(&inode->i_writecount) ? 0 : -ETXTBSY;
------------------------------------------------------------
can result in the following state:
------------------------------------------------------------
struct nfs4_file {
...
fi_fds = {0xffff880c1fa65c80, 0xffffffffffffffe6, 0x0},
fi_access = {{
counter = 0x1
}, {
counter = 0x0
}},
...
------------------------------------------------------------
1) First time around, in nfs4_get_vfs_file() fp->fi_fds[O_WRONLY] is
NULL, hence nfsd_open() is called where we get status set to an error
and fp->fi_fds[O_WRONLY] to -ETXTBSY. Thus we do not reach
nfs4_file_get_access() and fi_access[O_WRONLY] is not incremented.
2) Second time around, in nfs4_get_vfs_file() fp->fi_fds[O_WRONLY] is
NOT NULL (-ETXTBSY), so nfsd_open() is NOT called, but
nfs4_file_get_access() IS called and fi_access[O_WRONLY] is incremented.
Thus we leave a landmine in the form of the nfs4_file data structure in
an incorrect state.
3) Eventually, when __nfs4_file_put_access() is called it finds
fi_access[O_WRONLY] being non-zero, it decrements it and calls
nfs4_file_put_fd() which tries to fput -ETXTBSY.
------------------------------------------------------------
...
[exception RIP: fput+0x9]
RIP: ffffffff81177fa9 RSP: ffff88062e365c90 RFLAGS: 00010282
RAX: ffff880c2b3d99cc RBX: ffff880c2b3d9978 RCX: 0000000000000002
RDX: dead000000100101 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffffffffffe6
RBP: ffff88062e365c90 R8: ffff88041fe797d8 R9: ffff88062e365d58
R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000001
R13: 0000000000000007 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018
#9 [ffff88062e365c98] __nfs4_file_put_access at ffffffffa0562334 [nfsd]
#10 [ffff88062e365cc8] nfs4_file_put_access at ffffffffa05623ab [nfsd]
#11 [ffff88062e365ce8] free_generic_stateid at ffffffffa056634d [nfsd]
#12 [ffff88062e365d18] release_open_stateid at ffffffffa0566e4b [nfsd]
#13 [ffff88062e365d38] nfsd4_close at ffffffffa0567401 [nfsd]
#14 [ffff88062e365d88] nfsd4_proc_compound at ffffffffa0557f28 [nfsd]
#15 [ffff88062e365dd8] nfsd_dispatch at ffffffffa054543e [nfsd]
#16 [ffff88062e365e18] svc_process_common at ffffffffa04ba5a4 [sunrpc]
#17 [ffff88062e365e98] svc_process at ffffffffa04babe0 [sunrpc]
#18 [ffff88062e365eb8] nfsd at ffffffffa0545b62 [nfsd]
#19 [ffff88062e365ee8] kthread at ffffffff81090886
#20 [ffff88062e365f48] kernel_thread at ffffffff8100c14a
------------------------------------------------------------
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Harshula Jayasuriya <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <[email protected]>
koalo
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 4, 2014
When booting secondary CPUs, announce_cpu() is called to show which cpu has been brought up. For example: [ 0.402751] smpboot: Booting Node 0, Processors #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 OK [ 0.525667] smpboot: Booting Node 1, Processors #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 OK [ 0.755592] smpboot: Booting Node 0, Processors #12 #13 #14 #15 #16 #17 OK [ 0.890495] smpboot: Booting Node 1, Processors #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 But the last "OK" is lost, because 'nr_cpu_ids-1' represents the maximum possible cpu id. It should use the maximum present cpu id in case not all CPUs booted up. Signed-off-by: Libin <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] [ tweaked the changelog, removed unnecessary line break, tweaked the format to align the fields vertically. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
koalo
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 4, 2014
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1235977 The profile introspection seq file has a locking bug when policy is viewed from a virtual root (task in a policy namespace), introspection from the real root is not affected. The test for root while (parent) { is correct for the real root, but incorrect for tasks in a policy namespace. This allows the task to walk backup the policy tree past its virtual root causing it to be unlocked before the virtual root should be in the p_stop fn. This results in the following lockdep back trace: [ 78.479744] [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ] [ 78.479792] 3.11.0-11-generic #17 Not tainted [ 78.479838] ------------------------------------- [ 78.479885] grep/2223 is trying to release lock (&ns->lock) at: [ 78.479952] [<ffffffff817bf3be>] mutex_unlock+0xe/0x10 [ 78.480002] but there are no more locks to release! [ 78.480037] [ 78.480037] other info that might help us debug this: [ 78.480037] 1 lock held by grep/2223: [ 78.480037] #0: (&p->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff812111bd>] seq_read+0x3d/0x3d0 [ 78.480037] [ 78.480037] stack backtrace: [ 78.480037] CPU: 0 PID: 2223 Comm: grep Not tainted 3.11.0-11-generic #17 [ 78.480037] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 [ 78.480037] ffffffff817bf3be ffff880007763d60 ffffffff817b97ef ffff8800189d2190 [ 78.480037] ffff880007763d88 ffffffff810e1c6e ffff88001f044730 ffff8800189d2190 [ 78.480037] ffffffff817bf3be ffff880007763e00 ffffffff810e5bd6 0000000724fe56b7 [ 78.480037] Call Trace: [ 78.480037] [<ffffffff817bf3be>] ? mutex_unlock+0xe/0x10 [ 78.480037] [<ffffffff817b97ef>] dump_stack+0x54/0x74 [ 78.480037] [<ffffffff810e1c6e>] print_unlock_imbalance_bug+0xee/0x100 [ 78.480037] [<ffffffff817bf3be>] ? mutex_unlock+0xe/0x10 [ 78.480037] [<ffffffff810e5bd6>] lock_release_non_nested+0x226/0x300 [ 78.480037] [<ffffffff817bf2fe>] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0xce/0x180 [ 78.480037] [<ffffffff817bf3be>] ? mutex_unlock+0xe/0x10 [ 78.480037] [<ffffffff810e5d5c>] lock_release+0xac/0x310 [ 78.480037] [<ffffffff817bf2b3>] __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x83/0x180 [ 78.480037] [<ffffffff817bf3be>] mutex_unlock+0xe/0x10 [ 78.480037] [<ffffffff81376c91>] p_stop+0x51/0x90 [ 78.480037] [<ffffffff81211408>] seq_read+0x288/0x3d0 [ 78.480037] [<ffffffff811e9d9e>] vfs_read+0x9e/0x170 [ 78.480037] [<ffffffff811ea8cc>] SyS_read+0x4c/0xa0 [ 78.480037] [<ffffffff817ccc9d>] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f Signed-off-by: John Johansen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: James Morris <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: