Changes are need to the METS Header default configuration

[jmaferreira]

• The "Transfer type" is unnecessary in the form, it has a constant value in SIP 4: "STRUKTURÁLATLAN”.
• The ’ Transfer specification document’ is the same, it has a constant value in SIP 4: „34/2016. (XI. 30.) EMMI rendelet az elektronikus formában tárolt iratok közlevéltári átvételének eljárásrendjéről és műszaki követelményeiről”
• ‘Data system name’ and ‘Data system version’ are not mandatory for SIP4
• ’Package creator software’ and its version are constant values with Roda-in actual version data. Remove them from the form as they are filled automatically by the export procedure.

[chalkos]

Regarding part 4, per the Hungarian SIP 4 spec the agent name should be the software name and the agent note should contain the software version. RODA-in writes the software name and version to agent name. ie:

current:

<agent ROLE="CREATOR" TYPE="OTHER" OTHERTYPE="SOFTWARE">
    <name>RODA-in 2.1.0-beta.1</name>
</agent>

SIP 4 spec:

<agent ROLE="CREATOR" TYPE="OTHER" OTHERTYPE="SOFTWARE">
    <name>RODA-in</name>
    <note>2.1.0-beta.1</note>
</agent>

@jmaferreira Should I change the RODA-in export procedure to use name and note?
(and @hsilva-keep let me know if you think this change will break something else)

[jmaferreira]

I’m not qualified enough to answer that. Ask Helder and Zoltan please.

[chalkos]

@hsilva-keep is handling the <agent ROLE="CREATOR" TYPE="OTHER" OTHERTYPE="SOFTWARE"> part