You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As stated in tons of previous issues (#125, #142, #69), we need a lot more standards for things. Different inputs end up with really weird things happening on themes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If we want everything to be machine-readable and analyzable, yes.
But as it is now, the plain strings without any requirements allow tool/theme authors to print the phone numbers, dates, etc. just as they have been entered by the users.
And it allows users in Japan to enter their study type even if it doesn't match the titles from US/Australia/Canada/Europe that may have been defined in the specification at that point.
When adding the input, either the tools or the user has to transform a user-readable date (e.g. December 31, 2000) into a machine readable one. Same for all the other values, e.g. phone numbers.
As stated in tons of previous issues (#125, #142, #69), we need a lot more standards for things. Different inputs end up with really weird things happening on themes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: