Consistent naming of url types

[stp-ip]

For the main sections the field should be named website including personal website, company website, project website etc.

For links to more resource like things such as slides, videos, identifiers, downloadables, I would suggest source.

Update: Moving to the suggestion from @aloisdg

[aloisdg]

I would prefer a simple source. It is universal, short and widely used.

[olivif]

Renamed title slightly. website and source sound good to me!

[phumke]

+1 to @aloisdg - just source sounds good

[thomasdavis]

Could someone paste a larger example with source being used, a tiny bit confused.

[stp-ip]

@thomasdavis
On the go so a larger example has to wait, but the reasoning is that website is great for showcasing a website, but it might be the wrong word for a link to downloading a publication, or a link to the slides of a presentation etc.

Source therefore could be used for these additional resources provided via a url, which are not a website.
As we move into more generic territory with for example publication probably also applying to talks given, having a slides or video field for urls, is not the best idea, therefore we could add either one source field, or perhaps a sources array with url and label.

Hope that makes the reasoning behind this issue more apparent.

[stp-ip]

So the proposition:

• website for the actual websites.
• source with a URL and a label field for things such as videos, slides etc. (one source for now - maybe array later?)
• image either URL or base64 encoded for logo, image or ?showcasing?. See Logo for companies #233

[olivif]

+1 for website and source

for image, I would stick with URL for now.

[aloisdg]

I find it a bit cluttering to get source and website but I can understand the use. I am not against.

[stp-ip]

New proposal:

• website for actual websites
• source with a URL and a label field for things such as videos, slides, images for showcasing etc.
• image for company logos or project logos
• image for profile image instead of picture to make naming more consistent

[aloisdg]

@stp-ip I still find this to heavy

[stp-ip]

Ok simplifying and trying to work with this:

• website for actual websites
• source with a URL and a label field
• image for all images (company and profile)

[stp-ip]

Closing in favor of #256

Trying to finally get some headway.

[stp-ip]

During the PR to make the current schema conform to the specific url types it seems to make more sense to just use url for slides, videos and websites.

We might leave it at url for websites and profiles for now and revisit an array of urls called resources for publications, references or projects (slides, videos, mockups etc.)

[aloisdg]

Agreed