Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jetty WebSocket UpgradeRequest & UpgradeResponse types in Jetty 10 #5044

Closed
lachlan-roberts opened this issue Jul 14, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #5101
Closed

Jetty WebSocket UpgradeRequest & UpgradeResponse types in Jetty 10 #5044

lachlan-roberts opened this issue Jul 14, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #5101
Assignees

Comments

@lachlan-roberts
Copy link
Contributor

Jetty version
10.0.x

Description
The UpgradeRequest and UpgradeResponse types in jetty 10 seem like they could use some simplification.

There is the API UpgradeRequest and UpgradeResponse. The Server API JettyServerUpgradeRequest and JettyServerUpgradeResponse which do not extend the API interfaces. Then there are heaps of Adapters and Delegate classes for these to convert between different interfaces. And some of the methods on these remain unimplemented.

lachlan-roberts added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 30, 2020
lachlan-roberts added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 30, 2020
… to ClientUpgradeRequest

Signed-off-by: Lachlan Roberts <[email protected]>
lachlan-roberts added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 30, 2020
lachlan-roberts added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 30, 2020
lachlan-roberts added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 30, 2020
…ty-websocket-server

Signed-off-by: Lachlan Roberts <[email protected]>
lachlan-roberts added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 5, 2020
…adeRequestResponse

Issue #5044 - Refactor of Jetty WebSocket Upgrade Request/Response
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant