Update README with info regarding non-PR refspec #168
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Using the default `refspec` prohibits the project from automatically building non-PR branches like `origin/master`. Prepending the `refspec` with the heads and remote/origin allows the project to build pull requests as well as other branches like `origin/my-feature`. This should resolve jenkinsci#77. Big thanks to janinko#77 (comment) 😄
valdisrigdon
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 3, 2014
Update README with info regarding non-PR refspec
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Using the default
refspecprohibits the project from automatically building non-PR branches likeorigin/master. Prepending therefspecwith the heads and remote/origin allows the project to build pull requests as well as other branches likeorigin/my-feature. This should resolve #77.Big thanks to #77 (comment) 😄