Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use es-operator from 4.1 branch #537

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 18, 2019

Conversation

pavolloffay
Copy link
Member

Related to #481
Replaces #535

On the team meeting we agreed to use pinned es-operator version to avoid breaking us.

Signed-off-by: Pavol Loffay [email protected]

@pavolloffay pavolloffay requested a review from objectiser July 17, 2019 16:03
@kubectl apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openshift/elasticsearch-operator/release-${ES_OPERATOR_VERSION}/manifests/03-role-bindings.yaml
@kubectl apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openshift/elasticsearch-operator/release-${ES_OPERATOR_VERSION}/manifests/04-crd.yaml -n ${ES_OPERATOR_NAMESPACE}
@kubectl apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openshift/elasticsearch-operator/release-${ES_OPERATOR_VERSION}/manifests/05-deployment.yaml -n ${ES_OPERATOR_NAMESPACE}
@kubectl set image deployment/elasticsearch-operator elasticsearch-operator=quay.io/openshift/origin-elasticsearch-operator:${ES_OPERATOR_VERSION} -n ${ES_OPERATOR_NAMESPACE}
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like this more than sed, however this is not perfect either.

The manifest should have the correct version in the branch. I have submitted a PR for it openshift/elasticsearch-operator#175

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 17, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #537 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #537   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.97%   91.97%           
=======================================
  Files          69       69           
  Lines        3501     3501           
=======================================
  Hits         3220     3220           
  Misses        196      196           
  Partials       85       85

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 83aafae...4a5b918. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@objectiser objectiser left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM
Only difference vs using sed is that it has two deployments until the one that was modified terminates, but shouldn't be a big problem.

@objectiser objectiser merged commit 74f523c into jaegertracing:master Jul 18, 2019
@pavolloffay
Copy link
Member Author

thanks @objectiser. The es-operator deploys quite quickly it shouldn't cause problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants