perf(escapeHTML): use multiple replace

[SukkaW]

Benchmark: https://runkit.com/sukkaw/5e3003ffe7e84c0013f6210d

const Benchmark = require('benchmark');
const Suite = new Benchmark.Suite;
const html = `<p class="foo">Hello "world".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world".</p>`;
const htmlEntityMap = {
  '&': '&amp;',
  '<': '&lt;',
  '>': '&gt;',
  '"': '&quot;',
  '\'': '&#39;',
  '`': '&#96;',
  '/': '&#x2F;',
  '=': '&#x3D;'
};

Suite.add('Map replacement', () => {
  html.replace(/[&<>"'`/=]/g, a => htmlEntityMap[a]);
}).add('Multiple replace', () => {
  html.replace(/&/g, '&amp;').replace(/</g, '&lt;').replace(/>/g, '&gt;').replace(/"/g, '&quot;').replace(/\\/g, '&#39;').replace(/`/g, '&#96;').replace(/\//g, '&#x2F').replace(/=/g, '&#x3D');
}).on('cycle', function(event) {
  console.info(String(event.target));
}).run();

On my local computer, Multiple replace is the slower one under Node.js 10 but it is the faster one under Node.js 12 & 13:

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-0.01%) to 96.979% when pulling 087af71 on SukkaW:perf-escape-unescape into 4e7c24e on hexojs:master.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-0.01%) to 96.979% when pulling 087af71 on SukkaW:perf-escape-unescape into 4e7c24e on hexojs:master.

[seaoak]

I modified the source text to include all special characters.

const html = `<p class="foo">Hello "world&".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world\"".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world\`".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world=".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world\\".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world&".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world\"".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world\`".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world=".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world\\".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world&".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world\"".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world\`".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world=".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world\\".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world&".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world\"".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world\`".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world=".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world\\".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world&".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world\"".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world\`".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world=".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world\\".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world".</p><p class="foo">Hello "world".</p>`;

The result of benchmark with Node v12 is reversal.
Multiple replace is slower.

The result of benchmark with Node v13 is same as SukkaW's report.
Multiple replace is faster.

It is certain that my sample source text is unusual HTML.
I only show that this patch is not all-around.
Because this patch sacrifices readability,
the profit seems too little.

[SukkaW]

More performance benchmark needs to be done before we merge this.