-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update data source azurerm_policy_definition
: Make name
as a possible input variable
#6275
Update data source azurerm_policy_definition
: Make name
as a possible input variable
#6275
Conversation
c1026ff
to
9190c06
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the PR @ArcturusZhang,
Aside from a few minor comments i've left inline this looks good, should be good to merge once the they are addressed 🙂
azurerm/internal/services/policy/data_source_policy_definition.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
azurerm/internal/services/policy/data_source_policy_definition.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
azurerm/internal/services/policy/data_source_policy_definition.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
azurerm/internal/services/policy/tests/data_source_policy_definition_test.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
azurerm/internal/services/policy/tests/data_source_policy_definition_test.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
b869ea5
to
4b6ea99
Compare
Hi @katbyte thanks for the review! I have made some changes that resolves those comments, and deprecate the old |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for this @ArcturusZhang! hope you don't mind but i pushed a couple changed to get this merged 🙂 LGTM !
This has been released in version 2.6.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example: provider "azurerm" {
version = "~> 2.6.0"
}
# ... other configuration ... |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks! |
Fixes #6249
And I temporarily removed the validation function of management group id, since it will never be a resource ID here, it should be an UUID or some proper name of a management group, rather than a full ID. (And a mgmt group full ID is also not a valid resource ID)