-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Review ASG Sizes #9322
Milestone
Comments
ioannakok
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 31, 2023
`minCapacity` was bumped from 15 to 30 in #8724. After the fronts migration was completed, it seemed that 15 instances weren't holding up with the new traffic we were sending. That was a hotfix and there is upcoming work to split our stacks (#8351) but until we reach this point we would like to see whether we could handle the traffic with 25 instances. This change is part of the research we're doing to optimise how we scale: #9322. Co-authored-by: George B <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ravi <[email protected]>
ioannakok
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 31, 2023
`minCapacity` was bumped from 15 to 30 in #8724. After the fronts migration was completed, it seemed that 15 instances weren't holding up with the new traffic we were sending. That was a hotfix and there is upcoming work to split our stacks (#8351) but until we reach this point we would like to see whether we could handle the traffic with 25 instances. This change is part of the research we're doing to optimise how we scale: #9322. Co-authored-by: George B <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ravi <[email protected]>
ioannakok
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 1, 2023
`minCapacity` was bumped from 15 to 30 in #8724. After the fronts migration was completed, it seemed that 15 instances weren't holding up with the new traffic we were sending. That was a hotfix and there is upcoming work to split our stacks (#8351) but until we reach this point we would like to see whether we could handle the traffic with 25 instances. This change is part of the research we're doing to optimise how we scale: #9322. Co-authored-by: George B <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ravi <[email protected]>
PR that reduced |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
We're currently using a minimum of 15 and a maximum of 60 instances in production:
dotcom-rendering/dotcom-rendering/cloudformation.yml
Lines 72 to 78 in e234547
Do these limits allow enough headroom for our additional traffic, scaling requirements, and RiffRaff deploys?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: